Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Instagram
    • español
    • English
  • Contacto
  •  
    • español
    • English
  • Mi Cuenta
Acerca deAutoresTítulosTemasColeccionesComunidades☰
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
Ver ítem 
    xmlui.general.dspace_homeCentros Regionales y EEAsCentro Regional Mendoza - San JuanEEA MendozaArtículos científicosxmlui.ArtifactBrowser.ItemViewer.trail
  • Inicio
  • Centros Regionales y EEAs
  • Centro Regional Mendoza - San Juan
  • EEA Mendoza
  • Artículos científicos
  • Ver ítem

Night-time sap flow is parabolically linked to midday water potential for field-grown almond trees

Resumen
To quantify night-time (S n) and diurnal (S d) tree water uptake, two sets of sap flow sensors (heat-pulse compensated) were installed per tree in the north-east and south-west sides of the trunk in three trees per treatment. There were two treatments: (1) control, irrigated with 100 % ETc (T100), and (2) deficit, irrigated at 60 % ETc (T60) with daily irrigations at the peak atmospheric demand (December–January). Normalised S n by trees was in the range [ver mas...]
To quantify night-time (S n) and diurnal (S d) tree water uptake, two sets of sap flow sensors (heat-pulse compensated) were installed per tree in the north-east and south-west sides of the trunk in three trees per treatment. There were two treatments: (1) control, irrigated with 100 % ETc (T100), and (2) deficit, irrigated at 60 % ETc (T60) with daily irrigations at the peak atmospheric demand (December–January). Normalised S n by trees was in the range of 15–25 % throughout the season, compared to normalised S d, for T100 and T60, respectively. Furthermore, S n was parabolically correlated to plant water status from the previous day, measured as midday stem water potential. We also found strong correlations between S n and nocturnal vapour pressure deficit for T100 and T60, indicating that nocturnal transpiration was significant for both treatments. Differences in S n were observed for the NE and SW sensors for T60, being significantly less for the NE side (sunny side) compared to the SW side (more shaded). No differences were observed for T100 regarding probe positioning. [Cerrar]
Thumbnail
Autor
Fuentes, Sigfredo;   Mahadevan, M.;   Bonada, Marcos;   Skewes, Mark A.;   Cox, J.W.;  
Fuente
Irrigation Science 31 (6) : 1265–1276 (November 2013)
Fecha
2013-11
ISSN
0342-7188
1432-1319
URI
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00271-013-0403-3
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/3311
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-013-0403-3
Formato
pdf
Tipo de documento
artículo
Palabras Claves
Prunus dulcis; Almendra; Almonds; Traslocación; Translocation; Agua; Water; Crecimiento; Growth; Flujo de savia; Noche; Mediodía; Almendro;
Derechos de acceso
Restringido
Descargar
Compartir
  • Compartir
    Facebook Email Twitter Mendeley
Excepto donde se diga explicitamente, este item se publica bajo la siguiente descripción: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Unported (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5)
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítem