Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

resumen

Resumen
To quantify night-time (S n) and diurnal (S d) tree water uptake, two sets of sap flow sensors (heat-pulse compensated) were installed per tree in the north-east and south-west sides of the trunk in three trees per treatment. There were two treatments: (1) control, irrigated with 100 % ETc (T100), and (2) deficit, irrigated at 60 % ETc (T60) with daily irrigations at the peak atmospheric demand (December–January). Normalised S n by trees was in the range [ver mas...]
dc.contributor.authorFuentes, Sigfredo
dc.contributor.authorMahadevan, M.
dc.contributor.authorBonada, Marcos
dc.contributor.authorSkewes, Mark A.
dc.contributor.authorCox, J.W.
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-07T15:09:38Z
dc.date.available2018-09-07T15:09:38Z
dc.date.issued2013-11
dc.identifier.issn0342-7188
dc.identifier.issn1432-1319
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-013-0403-3
dc.identifier.urihttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00271-013-0403-3
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/3311
dc.description.abstractTo quantify night-time (S n) and diurnal (S d) tree water uptake, two sets of sap flow sensors (heat-pulse compensated) were installed per tree in the north-east and south-west sides of the trunk in three trees per treatment. There were two treatments: (1) control, irrigated with 100 % ETc (T100), and (2) deficit, irrigated at 60 % ETc (T60) with daily irrigations at the peak atmospheric demand (December–January). Normalised S n by trees was in the range of 15–25 % throughout the season, compared to normalised S d, for T100 and T60, respectively. Furthermore, S n was parabolically correlated to plant water status from the previous day, measured as midday stem water potential. We also found strong correlations between S n and nocturnal vapour pressure deficit for T100 and T60, indicating that nocturnal transpiration was significant for both treatments. Differences in S n were observed for the NE and SW sensors for T60, being significantly less for the NE side (sunny side) compared to the SW side (more shaded). No differences were observed for T100 regarding probe positioning.eng
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_AR
dc.language.isoenges_AR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesses_AR
dc.sourceIrrigation Science 31 (6) : 1265–1276 (November 2013)es_AR
dc.subjectPrunus dulcises_AR
dc.subjectAlmendraes_AR
dc.subjectAlmondseng
dc.subjectTraslocaciónes_AR
dc.subjectTranslocationeng
dc.subjectAguaes_AR
dc.subjectWatereng
dc.subjectCrecimientoes_AR
dc.subjectGrowtheng
dc.subject.otherFlujo de saviaes_AR
dc.subject.otherNochees_AR
dc.subject.otherMediodíaes_AR
dc.subject.otherAlmendroes_AR
dc.titleNight-time sap flow is parabolically linked to midday water potential for field-grown almond treeses_AR
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículoes_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_AR
dc.description.origenEEA Mendozaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Fuentes, Sigfredo. University of Melbourne. Melbourne School of Land and Environment; Australiaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Mahadevan, M. South Australian Research & Development Institute; Australiaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Bonada, Marcos. University of Melbourne. Melbourne School of Land and Environment; Australia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Skewes, Mark A. South Australian Research & Development Institute. Loxton Research Centre; Australiaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Cox, J.W. University of Melbourne. Melbourne School of Land and Environment; Australiaes_AR
dc.subtypecientifico


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

common

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem