Show simple item record

resumen

Abstract
Mango cultivars Tommy Atkins, Zill, Peach, Sabre, Rosa and Phiva were analyzed for their quality parameters (fruit weight, flesh color chroma, L, h0, total soluble solid [TSS]/titratable acidity [TA], firmness), bioactive compounds (total phenols, carotenoids, ascorbic acid, antioxidant activity) and polyphenol oxidase (PPO) activity. Cv. Sabre showed highest total phenolic content (76.43 mg gallic acid/100 g FW), carotenoids (9.90 mg/100 g of FW), [ver mas...]
dc.contributor.authorSellamuthu, Periyar Selvam
dc.contributor.authorDenoya, Gabriela Inés
dc.contributor.authorSivakumar, Dharini
dc.contributor.authorPolenta, Gustavo Alberto
dc.contributor.authorSoundy, Puffy
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-15T18:30:41Z
dc.date.available2018-05-15T18:30:41Z
dc.date.issued2016-12
dc.identifier.issn0146-9428
dc.identifier.issn1745-4557
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1111/jfq.12058
dc.identifier.urihttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jfq.12058
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/2405
dc.description.abstractMango cultivars Tommy Atkins, Zill, Peach, Sabre, Rosa and Phiva were analyzed for their quality parameters (fruit weight, flesh color chroma, L, h0, total soluble solid [TSS]/titratable acidity [TA], firmness), bioactive compounds (total phenols, carotenoids, ascorbic acid, antioxidant activity) and polyphenol oxidase (PPO) activity. Cv. Sabre showed highest total phenolic content (76.43 mg gallic acid/100 g FW), carotenoids (9.90 mg/100 g of FW), ascorbic acid content (69.71 mg/100 g of FW) and antioxidant activity (1.2 mg of gallic acid/g of FW), whereas cv. Peach mango contained lower bioactive compounds. Multivariate principal component analysis analysis showed higher concentration of bioactive compounds in cv. Sabre mango, whereas cv. Tommy Atkins was firm and heavier. Cv. Rosa and Phiva were moderately rich in bioactive compounds and lower in fruit weight and firmness, whereas cv. Peach was higher in TSS/ TA. The PPO activity was higher in cvs. Rosa and Zill.eng
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_AR
dc.language.isoenges_AR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_AR
dc.sourceJournal of Food Quality 36 (6) : 394-402. (December 2013)es_AR
dc.subjectMangoes_AR
dc.subjectMangoeseng
dc.subjectFrutases_AR
dc.subjectFruitseng
dc.subjectVariedadeses_AR
dc.subjectVarietieseng
dc.subjectCalidades_AR
dc.subjectQualityeng
dc.subject.otherCompuestos Bioactivoses_AR
dc.titleComparison of the Contents of Bioactive Compounds and Quality Parameters in Selected Mango Cultivarses_AR
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículoes_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_AR
dc.description.origenInstituto de Tecnología de Alimentoses_AR
dc.description.filFil: Sellamuthu, Periyar Selvam. Tshwane University of Technology. Department of Crop Science. Postharvest Technology Group; Sudáfricaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Denoya, Gabriela Inés. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Tecnología de Alimento. Laboratorio de Compuestos Proteicos; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Sivakumar, Dharini. Tshwane University of Technology. Department of Crop Science. Postharvest Technology Group; Sudáfricaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Polenta, Gustavo Alberto. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Tecnología de Alimento. Laboratorio de Compuestos Proteicos; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Soundy, Puffy. Tshwane University of Technology. Department of Crop Science. Postharvest Technology Group; Sudáfricaes_AR
dc.subtypecientifico


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

common

Show simple item record