Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Instagram
    • español
    • English
  • Contacto
  •  
    • español
    • English
  • Mi Cuenta
Acerca deAutoresTítulosTemasColeccionesComunidades☰
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
Ver ítem 
    xmlui.general.dspace_homeCentros Regionales y EEAsCentro Regional Patagonia NorteEEA BarilocheArtículos científicosxmlui.ArtifactBrowser.ItemViewer.trail
  • Inicio
  • Centros Regionales y EEAs
  • Centro Regional Patagonia Norte
  • EEA Bariloche
  • Artículos científicos
  • Ver ítem

Tradeoffs around crop residue biomass in smallholder crop-livestock systems - Whatïs next?

Resumen
Much has been written on the tradeoffs that smallholder farmers face when having to allocate their biomass resources among competing objectives such as feed, fuel, mulch, compost or the market. This paper summarises yet a new body of evidence from 10 studies on tradeoffs in the allocation of cereal crop residue biomass between soil management and livestock feeding in developing regions, published in the special issue of Agricultural Systems ‘Biomass use [ver mas...]
Much has been written on the tradeoffs that smallholder farmers face when having to allocate their biomass resources among competing objectives such as feed, fuel, mulch, compost or the market. This paper summarises yet a new body of evidence from 10 studies on tradeoffs in the allocation of cereal crop residue biomass between soil management and livestock feeding in developing regions, published in the special issue of Agricultural Systems ‘Biomass use tradeoffs in cereal cropping systems: Lessons and implications from the developing world’. The studies cover a diversity of socio-ecological contexts, farming system types and scales of analysis. We reflect on their main findings and methodological progress, and on the new and not-so-new implications of these findings for research and action in the development agenda. We propose stylised graphical models to portray tradeoffs and plausible trajectories towards synergies, in the hope that such generalisations would prevent further efforts to ‘reinvent the wheel’ in the realm of tradeoffs analysis. We advocate an ex-post impact assessment of recent investments in systems research to help focus such research further and clearly define its future role in prioritizing and targeting development interventions. [Cerrar]
Thumbnail
Autor
Tittonell, Pablo Adrian;   Gérard, Bruno;   Erenstein, Olaf;  
Fuente
Agricultural systems 134 : 119-128. (March 2015)
Fecha
2015-03
ISSN
0308-521X
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/1307
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X15000190
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2015.02.003
Formato
pdf
Tipo de documento
artículo
Palabras Claves
Biomasa; Biomass; Residuos de Cosechas; Crop Residues; Sistemas de Cultivo; Cropping Systems; Conservation Agriculture; Ganado; Livestock; Pequeños Productores; Stability Landscapes;
Derechos de acceso
Restringido
Descargar
Compartir
  • Compartir
    Facebook Email Twitter Mendeley
Excepto donde se diga explicitamente, este item se publica bajo la siguiente descripción: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Unported (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5)
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítem