Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

resumen

Resumen
Much has been written on the tradeoffs that smallholder farmers face when having to allocate their biomass resources among competing objectives such as feed, fuel, mulch, compost or the market. This paper summarises yet a new body of evidence from 10 studies on tradeoffs in the allocation of cereal crop residue biomass between soil management and livestock feeding in developing regions, published in the special issue of Agricultural Systems ‘Biomass use [ver mas...]
dc.contributor.authorTittonell, Pablo Adrian
dc.contributor.authorGérard, Bruno
dc.contributor.authorErenstein, Olaf
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-25T11:55:32Z
dc.date.available2017-09-25T11:55:32Z
dc.date.issued2015-03
dc.identifier.issn0308-521X
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2015.02.003
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/1307
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X15000190
dc.description.abstractMuch has been written on the tradeoffs that smallholder farmers face when having to allocate their biomass resources among competing objectives such as feed, fuel, mulch, compost or the market. This paper summarises yet a new body of evidence from 10 studies on tradeoffs in the allocation of cereal crop residue biomass between soil management and livestock feeding in developing regions, published in the special issue of Agricultural Systems ‘Biomass use tradeoffs in cereal cropping systems: Lessons and implications from the developing world’. The studies cover a diversity of socio-ecological contexts, farming system types and scales of analysis. We reflect on their main findings and methodological progress, and on the new and not-so-new implications of these findings for research and action in the development agenda. We propose stylised graphical models to portray tradeoffs and plausible trajectories towards synergies, in the hope that such generalisations would prevent further efforts to ‘reinvent the wheel’ in the realm of tradeoffs analysis. We advocate an ex-post impact assessment of recent investments in systems research to help focus such research further and clearly define its future role in prioritizing and targeting development interventions.eng
dc.formatapplication/pdfeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesseng
dc.sourceAgricultural systems 134 : 119-128. (March 2015)
dc.subjectBiomasaes_AR
dc.subjectBiomasseng
dc.subjectResiduos de Cosechas
dc.subjectCrop Residueseng
dc.subjectSistemas de Cultivo
dc.subjectCropping Systemseng
dc.subjectConservation Agricultureeng
dc.subjectGanado
dc.subjectLivestockeng
dc.subject.otherPequeños Productores
dc.subject.otherStability Landscapeseng
dc.titleTradeoffs around crop residue biomass in smallholder crop-livestock systems - Whatïs next?eng
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículoes_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleeng
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioneng
dc.description.filFil: Tittonell, Pablo Adrian. Wageningen University and Research Centre; Holanda. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche; Argentina
dc.description.filFil: Gérard, Bruno. Centro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maíz y Trigo; México
dc.description.filFil: Erenstein, Olaf. Centro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maíz y Trigo; México
dc.subtypecientifico


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

common

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem