Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

resumen

Resumen
This study characterized genetic diversity in the Argentine garlic germplasm bank by analysis of 10 SSR loci in 73 garlic accessions. A total of 43 alleles and polymorphic information content (PIC) value of 0.38, along with various accessions that could not be differentiated with these SSR markers, suggest a relatively high level of genetic redundancy in this garlic collection. Nonetheless, cluster analysis using different methodologies (UPGMA, STRUCTURE, [ver mas...]
dc.contributor.authorBarboza Rojas, Karina
dc.contributor.authorSalinas Palmieri, Maria Cecilia
dc.contributor.authorAcuña, Cintia Vanesa
dc.contributor.authorBannoud, Florencia
dc.contributor.authorBeretta, Hebe Vanesa
dc.contributor.authorGarcia Lampasona, Sandra Claudia
dc.contributor.authorBurba, Jose Luis
dc.contributor.authorGalmarini, Claudio Romulo
dc.contributor.authorCavagnaro, Pablo
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-30T15:10:30Z
dc.date.available2019-10-30T15:10:30Z
dc.date.issued2019-10
dc.identifier.issn0304-4238
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2019.108900
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304423819307861
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/6243
dc.description.abstractThis study characterized genetic diversity in the Argentine garlic germplasm bank by analysis of 10 SSR loci in 73 garlic accessions. A total of 43 alleles and polymorphic information content (PIC) value of 0.38, along with various accessions that could not be differentiated with these SSR markers, suggest a relatively high level of genetic redundancy in this garlic collection. Nonetheless, cluster analysis using different methodologies (UPGMA, STRUCTURE, and PCoA) consistently and clearly separated these germplasm into four clusters. The garlic accessions were clustered in general agreement with their flowering behavior, botanical variety, ecophysiological group, and commercial bulb color-type. Two SSR markers strongly associated with the flowering phenotype (i.e., bolting vs. non-bolting) and ecophysiological group of the accessions were identified. In addition to the genetic analysis, the garlic accessions were characterized for their bulb content of solids, total organosulfur compounds (estimated by analysis of pyruvate levels) and total phenolic compounds, three groups of compounds associated with garlic’s flavor (pungency), nutraceutical value, and postharvest quality. Significant (p < 0.001) and broad variation was found among the accessions for all three phytochemicals, and garlic genotypes with high levels of these compounds were identified. These results suggest that it will be possible to select for mild and pungent garlics, as well as for garlics with high functional value and longer shelf-life. Significant variation was revealed for phytochemicals content among different classes of botanical variety, flowering behavior and ecophysiological group.eng
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_AR
dc.language.isoenges_AR
dc.publisherElsevieres_AR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesses_AR
dc.sourceScientia Horticulturae : 108900 (Available online October 2019)es_AR
dc.subjectAjoes_AR
dc.subjectGarliceng
dc.subjectDiversidad Genética (como Recurso)es_AR
dc.subjectGenetic Diversity (as Resource)eng
dc.subjectGermoplasmaes_AR
dc.subjectGermplasmeng
dc.subjectPiruvatoses_AR
dc.subjectPyruvateseng
dc.subjectCompuestos Fenólicoses_AR
dc.subjectPhenolic Compoundseng
dc.subjectAllium Sativumes_AR
dc.subjectMicrosatéliteses_AR
dc.subjectMicrosatelliteseng
dc.subjectMarcadores Genéticoses_AR
dc.subjectGenetic Markerseng
dc.subject.otherMarcadores Moleculareses_AR
dc.titleAssessment of genetic diversity and population structure in a garlic (Allium sativum L.) germplasm collection varying in bulb content of pyruvate, phenolics, and solidses_AR
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículoes_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersiones_AR
dc.description.origenEEA La Consultaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Barboza Rojas, Karina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Mendoza; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria La Consulta; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Salinas Palmieri, Maria Cecilia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Mendoza; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria La Consulta; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Acuña, Cintia Vanesa. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Biotecnología; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Bannoud, Florencia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Mendoza; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria La Consulta; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Beretta, Hebe Vanesa. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Mendoza; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria La Consulta; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Garcia Lampasona, Sandra Claudia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria La Consulta; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Laboratorio de Biología Molecular. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Laboratorio de Biología Molecular; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Burba, José Luis. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria La Consulta; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Galmarini, Claudio Romulo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Mendoza; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria La Consulta; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Instituto de Horticultura; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Cavagnaro, Pablo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Mendoza; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria La Consulta; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Instituto de Horticultura; Argentinaes_AR
dc.subtypecientifico


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

common

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem