Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

resumen

Resumen
Male and female moth catches of Grapholita molesta (Busck) in traps were evaluated in stone and pome fruit orchards untreated or treated with sex pheromones for mating disruption in Uruguay, Argentina, Chile, USA, and Italy from 2015 to 2017. Trials evaluated various blends loaded into either membrane cup lures or septa. Membrane lures were loaded with terpinyl acetate (TA), acetic acid (AA) and (Z)‐3‐hexenyl acetate alone or in combinations. Two septa [ver mas...]
dc.contributor.authorMujica, María Valentina
dc.contributor.authorPreti, Michele
dc.contributor.authorBasoalto, Esteban
dc.contributor.authorCichon, Liliana
dc.contributor.authorFuentes-Contreras, Eduardo
dc.contributor.authorBarros-Parada, Wilson
dc.contributor.authorKrawczyk, Greg
dc.contributor.authorNunes, Marcelo Z.
dc.contributor.authorWalgenbach, Jim F.
dc.contributor.authorHansen, Randy
dc.contributor.authorKnight, Alan L.
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-12T18:22:38Z
dc.date.available2019-02-12T18:22:38Z
dc.date.issued2018-09
dc.identifier.issn1439-0418
dc.identifier.issn0931-2048
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s41240-018-0111-2
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/4434
dc.description.abstractMale and female moth catches of Grapholita molesta (Busck) in traps were evaluated in stone and pome fruit orchards untreated or treated with sex pheromones for mating disruption in Uruguay, Argentina, Chile, USA, and Italy from 2015 to 2017. Trials evaluated various blends loaded into either membrane cup lures or septa. Membrane lures were loaded with terpinyl acetate (TA), acetic acid (AA) and (Z)‐3‐hexenyl acetate alone or in combinations. Two septa lures were loaded with either the three‐component sex pheromone blend for G. molesta alone or in combination with codlemone (2‐PH), the sex pheromone of Cydia pomonella (L). A third septum lure included the combination sex pheromone blend plus pear ester, (E,Z)‐2,4‐ethyl decadienoate (2‐PH/PE), and a fourth septum was loaded with only β‐ocimene. Results were consistent across geographical areas showing that the addition of β‐ocimene or (Z)‐3‐hexenyl acetate did not increase moth catches. The addition of pear ester to the sex pheromone lure marginally increased moth catches. The use of TA and AA together significantly increased moth catches compared with the use of only one of the two components. Traps with the TA/AA lure outperformed the Ajar trap baited with a liquid TA plus sugar bait. The emission rate of AA was not a significant factor affecting the performance of the TA/AA lure. The addition of TA/AA significantly increased moth catches when combined with the 2‐PH lure. The TA/AA lure also allowed traps to catch both sexes. Catch of C. pomonella with the 2‐PH lure was comparable to the use of codlemone; however, moth catch was significantly reduced with the 2‐PH/PE lure. Optimization of these complex lures can likely further improve managers’ ability to monitor G. molesta and help to develop multispecies tortricid lures for use in individual traps.es_AR
dc.formatapplication/pdfeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesseng
dc.sourceJournal of applied entomology 142 (8) : 731-744 .(September 2018)eng
dc.subjectGrapholita Molestaes_AR
dc.subjectCydia Pomonellaes_AR
dc.subjectLepidopteraes_AR
dc.subjectTortricidaees_AR
dc.subjectAppleseng
dc.subjectManzanaes_AR
dc.subjectPrunus Persicaes_AR
dc.subjectPome Fruitseng
dc.subjectFrutas de Pepitaes_AR
dc.subjectAcido Acético
dc.subject.otherPeacheng
dc.subject.otherMelocotones_AR
dc.subject.otherMating Disruptioneng
dc.subject.otherInterrupción del Apareamientoes_AR
dc.subject.otherMonitoringeng
dc.subject.otherMonitoreoes_AR
dc.subject.otherOriental Fruit Motheng
dc.subject.otherPolilla de la Fruta Orientales_AR
dc.subject.otherTerpinyl Acetateeng
dc.subject.otherAcetato de Terpinilo
dc.titleImproved monitoring of oriental fruit moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) with terpinyl acetate plus acetic acid membrane lureseng
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículoes_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleeng
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioneng
dc.description.origenEEA Alto Vallees_AR
dc.description.filFil: Mujica, María Valentina. Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA). Protección Vegetal; Uruguayes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Basoalto, Esteban. Universidad Austral de Chile (UACh). Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Instituto de Producción y Sanidad Vegetal; Chilees_AR
dc.description.filFil: Preti, Michele. Free University of Bozen-Bolzano (UNIBZ).· Faculty of Science and Technology; Italiaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Cichón, Liliana Isabel. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Alto Valle; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Fuentes-Contreras, Eduardo. Universidad de Talca. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Chilees_AR
dc.description.filFil: Barros-Parada, Wilson. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso (PUCV). Escuela de Agronomía; Chilees_AR
dc.description.filFil: Krawczyk, Greg. Pennsylvania State University. Penn State Department of Entomology; Estados Unidoses_AR
dc.description.filFil: Nunes, Marcelo Z. Pennsylvania State University. Penn State Department of Entomology. Fruit Research and Extension Center; Estados Unidoses_AR
dc.description.filFil: Walgenbach, Jim F. North Carolina State University. Mountain Horticultural Crops Research & Extension Center; Estados Unidoses_AR
dc.description.filFil: Hansen, Randy. Hansen Associates; Estados Unidoses_AR
dc.description.filKnight, Alan L. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). Agricultural Research Service; Estados Unidoses_AR
dc.subtypecientifico


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

common

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem