Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

resumen

Resumen
Landscapes dominated by conventional agriculture reduce and simplify natural habitats, with negative consequences for ecosystem regulating services. We examined differences in structure and composition of bee communities across biotic and abiotic gradients to investigate how these communities respond to land-use changes associated with agriculture. Studies like ours which evaluates the relative effect of different components of spatial heterogeneity [ver mas...]
dc.contributor.authorCavigliasso, Pablo
dc.contributor.authorPhifer, Colin C.
dc.contributor.authorKnowlton, Jessie L.
dc.contributor.authorLicata, Julián Andrés
dc.contributor.authorFlaspohler, David J.
dc.contributor.authorWebster, Christopher R.
dc.contributor.authorChacoff, Natacha Paola
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-18T14:01:47Z
dc.date.available2022-10-18T14:01:47Z
dc.date.issued2022-12
dc.identifier.issn0167-8809
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2022.108150
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/13143
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0167880922002997
dc.description.abstractLandscapes dominated by conventional agriculture reduce and simplify natural habitats, with negative consequences for ecosystem regulating services. We examined differences in structure and composition of bee communities across biotic and abiotic gradients to investigate how these communities respond to land-use changes associated with agriculture. Studies like ours which evaluates the relative effect of different components of spatial heterogeneity remain uncommon and are important to conserve pollinator fauna. The diversity of floral resources and habitat richness including the configuration and composition of landscape heterogeneity have been shown to influence the diversity of wild bees on a landscape scale. In this study, we examined how wild bee communities respond to landscape heterogeneity in a semi-arid productive region of Entre Ríos Argentina. We modeled the effect of landscape heterogeneity on wild bee community abundance, species richness, and Chao-1 diversity. We sampled bees using pan traps in four common land-uses in the region (forest plantations, pasture/croplands, mixed use areas and native espinal savanna) for five months in the spring-summer of 2014–2015. We identified 96 bee species among 3407 bees collected in the four habitat types. Pasture/croplands along with native espinal savanna supported the highest abundance, richness, and diversity of bees. Species composition of wild bee communities differed between land uses, with numerous species unique to each land use. Across all land use types, diversity of flower resources consistently supported more abundant and diverse wild bee communities. The richness of habitats along with the diversity of floral resources acted synergistically over wild bee communities. Our findings further clarify the relationship between land-use and wild bee communities, which provide valuable pollination services to crops and native plants. Continued expansion of large-scale monoculture forest plantations will likely come at the expense of the native floral resources, which are a key component to support regional bee species richness. Promoting landscapes with a diversity of crops and flower resources are important for the conservation of pollinators that are key for the functioning of ecosystems.eng
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_AR
dc.language.isoenges_AR
dc.publisherElsevieres_AR
dc.relationinfo:eu-repograntAgreement/INTA/PNAPI/AR./Programa Nacional Apiculturaes_AR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesses_AR
dc.sourceAgriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 340 : 108150 (December 2022)es_AR
dc.subjectApidaees_AR
dc.subjectApiculturaes_AR
dc.subjectApicultureeng
dc.subjectPaisajees_AR
dc.subjectLandscapeeng
dc.subjectUtilización de la Tierraes_AR
dc.subjectLand Useeng
dc.subjectServicios de los Ecosistemases_AR
dc.subjectEcosystem Serviceseng
dc.subjectCambio de Uso de la Tierraes_AR
dc.subjectLand Use Changeeng
dc.titleInfluence of landscape composition on wild bee communities: Effects of functional landscape heterogeneityes_AR
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículoes_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_AR
dc.description.origenEEA Concordiaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Cavigliasso, Pablo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Concordia; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Phifer, Colin C. Michigan Technological University. School of Forest Resources and Environmental Science; Estados Unidoses_AR
dc.description.filFil: Knowlton, Jessie L. Michigan Technological University. School of Forest Resources and Environmental Science; Estados Unidoses_AR
dc.description.filFil: Knowlton, Jessie L. Wheaton College. Department of Biology; Estados Unidoses_AR
dc.description.filFil: Licata, Julián Andrés. Bemidji State University. Institutional Research Department; Estados Unidoses_AR
dc.description.filFil: Flaspohler, David J. Michigan Technological University. School of Forest Resources and Environmental Science; Estadoses_AR
dc.description.filFil: Webster, Christopher R. Michigan Technological University. School of Forest Resources and Environmental Science; Estadoses_AR
dc.description.filFil: Chacoff, Natacha Paola. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo. Instituto de Ecología Regional; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Chacoff, Natacha Paola. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Ecología Regional; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Chacoff, Natacha Paola. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo; Argentinaes_AR
dc.subtypecientifico


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

common

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem