Show simple item record

resumen

Abstract
Soil is the most important terrestrial carbon (C) reservoir but is greatly impacted by land use change (LUC). Previous analyses of LUC impacts on soil C have focused on biophysical variables, leaving aside the influence of socioeconomics. The aim of our study was to determine global soil organic carbon (SOC) change patterns after LUC and to assess the impacts of both biophysical and socioeconomic factors that influence stocks of SOC after LUC [ver mas...]
dc.contributor.authorDuarte Guardia, Sandra
dc.contributor.authorPeri, Pablo Luis
dc.contributor.authorAmelung, Wulf
dc.contributor.authorThomas, Evert
dc.contributor.authorBorchard, Nils
dc.contributor.authorBaldi, Germán
dc.contributor.authorCowie, Annette L.
dc.contributor.authorLadd, Brenton
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-28T15:39:18Z
dc.date.available2021-01-28T15:39:18Z
dc.date.issued2020-07-24
dc.identifier.citationDuarte-Guardia, S., Peri, P., Amelung, W. et al. Biophysical and socioeconomic factors influencing soil carbon stocks: a global assessment. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 25, 1129–1148 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-020-09926-1es_AR
dc.identifier.issn1381-2386
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-020-09926-1
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/8659
dc.descriptionCientíficoes_AR
dc.description.abstractSoil is the most important terrestrial carbon (C) reservoir but is greatly impacted by land use change (LUC). Previous analyses of LUC impacts on soil C have focused on biophysical variables, leaving aside the influence of socioeconomics. The aim of our study was to determine global soil organic carbon (SOC) change patterns after LUC and to assess the impacts of both biophysical and socioeconomic factors that influence stocks of SOC after LUC simultaneously. This was done at a global scale using 817 sites from 99 peer-reviewed publications. We performed separate analyses for cases in which there were gains and losses of SOC. The best predictors of SOC stock changes were the type of LUC and predictors related to sampling depth, climate, biome, soil order, relief, geology, years since LUC, and primary productivity. However, also, socioeconomic variables such as indices of poverty, population growth, and levels of corruption were important. They explained 33% of the variability in SOC on their own and helped improve model accuracy from 42 to 53% when considered in combination with biophysical variables. SOC losses were highly correlated to the type of LUC and social variables, while SOC gains correlated most strongly with years since LUC and the biophysical variables. The analyses confirm that one of the biggest drivers of SOC loss is conversion to agroindustrial scale cropping, whereas with regard to the recuperation of SOC after LUC, the factor “time since conversion” emerged as the most important predictive variable, which must be better integrated in respective policy expectations. We conclude that policies should more than ever incentivize holistic approaches that prevent additional loss of native SOC, while at the same time promoting sustainable intensification of existing agricultural regions. Finally future investments on LUC to regain SOC should be aligned with efforts to alleviate poverty and corruption for their potential to achieve mutual gains in soil fertility and socio-economic parameters.es_AR
dc.formatapplication/pdfeng
dc.language.isoenges_AR
dc.publisherSpringeres_AR
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/reference/hdl/20.500.12123/8661
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesseng
dc.sourceMitigation and adaptation strategies for global change. 25: 1129–1148. (July 2020)es_AR
dc.subjectLand Use Changeeng
dc.subjectSocioeconomic Developmenteng
dc.subjectBiophysicseng
dc.subjectIniciativa de Indicadores Globales sobre la Tierraes_AR
dc.subjectGlobal Land Indicator Initiativeeng
dc.subjectCarbones_AR
dc.subjectCarbon Stock Assessmentseng
dc.subjectEstimación de Existencias de Carbonoes_AR
dc.subjectCambio de Uso de la Tierraes_AR
dc.subjectEntorno Socioeconómicoes_AR
dc.subjectCarbono Orgánico Totales_AR
dc.subjectSueloes_AR
dc.subjectClimaes_AR
dc.subjectGeologíaes_AR
dc.subjectPrimary Productivityeng
dc.subjectProductividad Primariaes_AR
dc.subjectPovertyes_AR
dc.subjectPobrezaes_AR
dc.subjectCrecimiento de la Poblaciónes_AR
dc.subjectForest Plantationseng
dc.subjectPlantación Forestales_AR
dc.subjectBosqueses_AR
dc.subjectCultivoses_AR
dc.subjectPastizaleses_AR
dc.subjectAgriculturaes_AR
dc.subject.otherFactores Biofísicoses_AR
dc.subject.otherEstudio Globales_AR
dc.subject.otherBiomases_AR
dc.subject.otherIndice de Pobrezaes_AR
dc.titleBiophysical and socioeconomic factors influencing soil carbon stocks: a global assessmenteng
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículoes_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleeng
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioneng
dc.description.origenEEA SANTA CRUZes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Duarte Guardia, Sandra. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral; Argentina.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santa Cruz; Argentina.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral (UNPA). Santa Cruz; Argentina.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET); Argentina.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: Amelung, Wulf. University of Bonn. Soil Science and Soil Ecology. Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation (INRES). Bonn; Alemania.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: Thomas, Evert. Bioversity International. Lima; Perú.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: Borchard, Nils. Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke). Plant Production. Helsinki; Finlandia.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: Baldi, Germán. Universidad Nacional de San Luis. Instituto de Matemática Aplicada. San Luis; Argentina.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: Baldi, Germán. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET). San Luis; Argentina.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: Cowie, Annette L. NSW Department of Primary Industries. Armidale. NSW; Australia.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: Cowie, Annette L. University of New England. School of Environmental and Rural Science. Armidale. NSW; Australia.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: Ladd, Brenton. Universidad Científica del Sur. Escuela de Agroforestería. Lima; Perú.es_AR
dc.subtypecientifico


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

common

Show simple item record