Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

resumen

Resumen
The analysis of sulfur concentration (SC) and nitrogen to S ratio (N/S) in plant tissue are some of the suggested tools to evaluate S deficiency in maize (Zea mays L.). However, the convenience of one over the other and the tissue that should be analyzed (upper leaf or shoot) is still questioned. Therefore, the objectives of our study were to: i) evaluate the stability of shoot and upper leaf N/S ratio with increasing shoot biomass (BM), ii) compare SC vs [ver mas...]
dc.contributor.authorCarciochi, Walter
dc.contributor.authorReussi Calvo, Nahuel Ignacio
dc.contributor.authorWyngaard, Nicolás
dc.contributor.authorDivito, Guillermo
dc.contributor.authorEyherabide, Mercedes
dc.contributor.authorEcheverria, Hernan Eduardo
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-06T10:55:02Z
dc.date.available2021-01-06T10:55:02Z
dc.date.issued2019-05
dc.identifier.issn1161-0301
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2019.04.008
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/8556
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1161030118307093
dc.description.abstractThe analysis of sulfur concentration (SC) and nitrogen to S ratio (N/S) in plant tissue are some of the suggested tools to evaluate S deficiency in maize (Zea mays L.). However, the convenience of one over the other and the tissue that should be analyzed (upper leaf or shoot) is still questioned. Therefore, the objectives of our study were to: i) evaluate the stability of shoot and upper leaf N/S ratio with increasing shoot biomass (BM), ii) compare SC vs N/S in shoot or upper leaf as S prognosis tools, and iii) evaluate the use of SC simultaneously with grain N/S as a S diagnostic method in maize. Different S fertilization rates (0–32 kg S ha−1) were evaluated in nine field experiments where S and N concentration were determined in maize shoot, uppermost fully developed leaf, and grain samples. The main results of our study were: i) the N/S ratio in shoot and upper leaf was not stable with increasing BM; ii) the S prognosis capacity was similar when measuring SC or N/S on the shoot or upper leaf in vegetative growth stages, and iii) SC in grain allowed an adequate S diagnosis, which was not improved by including N/S in the prediction. In conclusion, based on its simplicity and reliability, we suggested the use of SC in the upper leaf at ≈V6 stage as a S prognosis tool (2.1 g kg−1 threshold). In addition, a 1.12 g S kg−1 threshold in grain was adequate for S diagnosis.eng
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_AR
dc.language.isoenges_AR
dc.publisherElsevieres_AR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesses_AR
dc.sourceEuropean Journal of Agronomy 108 : 1-10 (2019)es_AR
dc.subjectMaízes_AR
dc.subjectMaizeeng
dc.subjectAnálisis de Tejidoses_AR
dc.subjectTissue Analysiseng
dc.subjectConcentraciónes_AR
dc.subjectConcentrationeng
dc.subjectAzufrees_AR
dc.subjectSulphureng
dc.subjectAplicación de Abonoses_AR
dc.subjectFertilizer Applicationeng
dc.titlePrognosis and diagnosis of sulfur status in maize by plant analysises_AR
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículoes_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_AR
dc.description.origenEEA Balcarcees_AR
dc.description.filFil: Carciochi, Walter D. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: Reussi Calvo, Nahuel I. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: Wyngaard, Nicolás. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: Divito, Guillermo A. Asociación Argentina de Productores en Siembra Directa; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Eyherabide, Mercedes. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: .Echeverría, Hernán Eduardo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina.es_AR
dc.subtypecientifico


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

common

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem