Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Instagram
    • español
    • English
  • Contacto
  •  
    • español
    • English
  • Mi Cuenta
Acerca deAutoresTítulosTemasColeccionesComunidades☰
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
Ver ítem 
    xmlui.general.dspace_homeCentros Regionales y EEAsCentro Regional Buenos Aires SurEEA BalcarceArtículos científicosxmlui.ArtifactBrowser.ItemViewer.trail
  • Inicio
  • Centros Regionales y EEAs
  • Centro Regional Buenos Aires Sur
  • EEA Balcarce
  • Artículos científicos
  • Ver ítem

Prognosis and diagnosis of sulfur status in maize by plant analysis

Resumen
The analysis of sulfur concentration (SC) and nitrogen to S ratio (N/S) in plant tissue are some of the suggested tools to evaluate S deficiency in maize (Zea mays L.). However, the convenience of one over the other and the tissue that should be analyzed (upper leaf or shoot) is still questioned. Therefore, the objectives of our study were to: i) evaluate the stability of shoot and upper leaf N/S ratio with increasing shoot biomass (BM), ii) compare SC vs [ver mas...]
The analysis of sulfur concentration (SC) and nitrogen to S ratio (N/S) in plant tissue are some of the suggested tools to evaluate S deficiency in maize (Zea mays L.). However, the convenience of one over the other and the tissue that should be analyzed (upper leaf or shoot) is still questioned. Therefore, the objectives of our study were to: i) evaluate the stability of shoot and upper leaf N/S ratio with increasing shoot biomass (BM), ii) compare SC vs N/S in shoot or upper leaf as S prognosis tools, and iii) evaluate the use of SC simultaneously with grain N/S as a S diagnostic method in maize. Different S fertilization rates (0–32 kg S ha−1) were evaluated in nine field experiments where S and N concentration were determined in maize shoot, uppermost fully developed leaf, and grain samples. The main results of our study were: i) the N/S ratio in shoot and upper leaf was not stable with increasing BM; ii) the S prognosis capacity was similar when measuring SC or N/S on the shoot or upper leaf in vegetative growth stages, and iii) SC in grain allowed an adequate S diagnosis, which was not improved by including N/S in the prediction. In conclusion, based on its simplicity and reliability, we suggested the use of SC in the upper leaf at ≈V6 stage as a S prognosis tool (2.1 g kg−1 threshold). In addition, a 1.12 g S kg−1 threshold in grain was adequate for S diagnosis. [Cerrar]
Thumbnail
Autor
Carciochi, Walter;   Reussi Calvo, Nahuel Ignacio;   Wyngaard, Nicolás;   Divito, Guillermo;   Eyherabide, Mercedes;   Echeverria, Hernan Eduardo;  
Fuente
European Journal of Agronomy 108 : 1-10 (2019)
Fecha
2019-05
Editorial
Elsevier
ISSN
1161-0301
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/8556
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1161030118307093
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2019.04.008
Formato
pdf
Tipo de documento
artículo
Palabras Claves
Maíz; Maize; Análisis de Tejidos; Tissue Analysis; Concentración; Concentration; Azufre; Sulphur; Aplicación de Abonos; Fertilizer Application;
Derechos de acceso
Restringido
Descargar
Compartir
  • Compartir
    Facebook Email Twitter Mendeley
Excepto donde se diga explicitamente, este item se publica bajo la siguiente descripción: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Unported (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5)
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítem