Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

resumen

Resumen
Reconciling agriculture and biodiversity conservation is a challenge given the growing demand for agricultural products. In recent decades, Argentina has witnessed agricultural expansion and intensification affecting biodiversity and associated ecosystem services. Within agroecosystems, the level of habitat quality is critical for birds, and may depend on vegetation structure, availability of invertebrate prey, and the use of pesticides. Although the [ver mas...]
dc.contributor.authorGoijman, Andrea Paula
dc.contributor.authorConroy, Michael J.
dc.contributor.authorVarni, Vanina Delia
dc.contributor.authorThompson, Jeffrey
dc.contributor.authorZaccagnini, Maria Elena
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-11T12:55:01Z
dc.date.available2020-12-11T12:55:01Z
dc.date.issued2020-12
dc.identifier.issn2053-7166
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40657-020-00235-4
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/8394
dc.identifier.urihttps://avianres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40657-020-00235-4
dc.description.abstractReconciling agriculture and biodiversity conservation is a challenge given the growing demand for agricultural products. In recent decades, Argentina has witnessed agricultural expansion and intensification affecting biodiversity and associated ecosystem services. Within agroecosystems, the level of habitat quality is critical for birds, and may depend on vegetation structure, availability of invertebrate prey, and the use of pesticides. Although the relationship between vegetation structure and avian occurrence has been widely studied, to our knowledge, there are no studies that also incorporate prey availability throughout the cycle of soybean crops in Argentina. We estimated and predicted the effects of land cover and temporal variation on the occurrence of avian foraging guilds in Entre Ríos, Argentina, in order to guide management related to potential ecosystem services provided by birds. We also estimated temporal effects of vegetation structure and insecticides on the main arthropod orders consumed by birds to evaluate prey availability. Methods: We conducted bird and arthropod surveys for 2 years along transects located in 20 randomly selected soybean fields (N = 60) and their adjacent borders (N = 78) throughout the crop growing season, in four seasons. We estimated avian occupancy, accounting for imperfect detection, and arthropod counts fitting generalized linear mixed models. Results: The number of native trees in field borders positively influenced the occurrence of most bird species, mainly insectivores. Granivore foliage gleaners, also were positively affected by grass height. Salliers and aerial foragers were weakly affected by distance to forest and native trees. In general, the availability of invertebrates to birds was highest during the third season. Arthropod counts in borders were greater during the last three crop stages than during the pre-sowing period. Conclusions: We found that with 10 to 15 native tree species in borders, coupled with a complex vegetation structure with shrubs and grasses, we could conserve a wide spectrum of insectivorous birds, and may contribute to the invertebrate pest control service. Vegetated field borders function as a refuge for arthropods, especially agriculturally beneficial taxa such as Hymenopterans. Finally, several groups of birds use the interior of the fields and could help control pests.eng
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_AR
dc.language.isoenges_AR
dc.publisherBMCes_AR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_AR
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.sourceAvian Research 11 : Article number: 48 (2020)es_AR
dc.subjectAveses_AR
dc.subjectEcosistemaes_AR
dc.subjectEcosystemseng
dc.subjectSojaes_AR
dc.subjectSoybeanseng
dc.subjectVegetaciónes_AR
dc.subjectVegetationeng
dc.subjectServicios de los Ecosistemases_AR
dc.subjectEcosystem Serviceseng
dc.subject.otherEntre Ríos, Argentinaes_AR
dc.titleOccupancy of avian foraging guilds in soybean fields and borders in Entre Ríos, Argentina: responses to vegetation structure and prey resourceses_AR
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículoes_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_AR
dc.rights.licenseCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
dc.description.origenInstituto de Recursos Biológicoses_AR
dc.description.filFil: Goijman, Andrea Paula. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Recursos Biológicos; Argentina. University of Georgia. D.B. Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources; Estados Unidoses_AR
dc.description.filFil: Conroy, Michael J. University of Georgia. D.B. Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources; Estados Unidoses_AR
dc.description.filFil: Varni, Vanina Delia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Recursos Biológicos; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Thompson, Jeffrey. Guyra Paraguay – CONACYT; Paraguay. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Recursos Biológicos; Argentina.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: Zaccagnini, Maria Elena. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Recursos Biológicos; Argentinaes_AR
dc.subtypecientifico


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

common

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess