Show simple item record

resumen

Abstract
Spoligotyping is the most frequently used method for genotyping isolates of Mycobacterium bovis worldwide. In the current work, we compared spoligotypes from 1684 M. bovis isolates from Argentina (816), Brazil (412), Chile (66), Mexico (274) and Venezuela (116), obtained from cattle, humans, pigs, wild boars, farmed deer, goats, buffaloes, cats, and wild animals. A total of 269 different spoligotypes were found: 142 (8.4%) isolates presented orphan [ver mas...]
dc.contributor.authorZumarraga, Martin Jose
dc.contributor.authorArriaga, Camila
dc.contributor.authorBarandiaran, Soledad
dc.contributor.authorCobos-Marín, Laura
dc.contributor.authorde Waard, Jacobus
dc.contributor.authorEstrada-Garcia, Iris
dc.contributor.authorFigueiredo, Telma
dc.contributor.authorFigueroa, Alvaro
dc.contributor.authorGimenez, Francisco
dc.contributor.authorGomes, Harrison M.
dc.contributor.authorGonzalez-y-Merchand, Jorge A.
dc.contributor.authorMacías, Analía
dc.contributor.authorMilián-Suazo, Feliciano
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez, Cesar Alejandro Rosales
dc.contributor.authorSantillán, Marco Antonio
dc.contributor.authorSuffys, Philip Noel
dc.contributor.authorTrangoni, Marcos David
dc.contributor.authorZarraga, Ana Maria
dc.contributor.authorCataldi, Angel Adrian
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-24T16:27:12Z
dc.date.available2020-11-24T16:27:12Z
dc.date.issued2013-02
dc.identifier.issn1532-2661
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2012.07.012
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/8315
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0034528812002202
dc.description.abstractSpoligotyping is the most frequently used method for genotyping isolates of Mycobacterium bovis worldwide. In the current work, we compared spoligotypes from 1684 M. bovis isolates from Argentina (816), Brazil (412), Chile (66), Mexico (274) and Venezuela (116), obtained from cattle, humans, pigs, wild boars, farmed deer, goats, buffaloes, cats, and wild animals. A total of 269 different spoligotypes were found: 142 (8.4%) isolates presented orphan spoligotypes, whereas 1542 (91.6%) formed 113 different clusters. In cattle, SB0140 was the most representative spoligotype with 355 (24.6%) isolates, followed by SB0121 with 149 (10.3%) isolates. Clustering of spoligotypes ranged from 95.2% in Argentina to 85.3% in Mexico. Orphan spoligotypes were also variable, ranging from 23.7% in Mexico to 4.1% in Brazil. A large proportion of spoligotypes were common to the neighboring countries Argentina, Brazil and Chile. In conclusion, despite the diversity of spoligotypes found in the five countries studied, there are major patterns that predominate in these neighboring countries. These clusters may reflect a long-lasting active transmission of bovine tuberculosis or common historical origins of infection.eng
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_AR
dc.language.isoenges_AR
dc.publisherElsevieres_AR
dc.relationinfo:eu-repograntAgreement/INTA/AERG-232121/AR./Desarrollo de métodos de diagnóstico molecular aplicados a la detección y tipificación de microorganismos patógenoses_AR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesses_AR
dc.sourceResearch in Veterinary Science 94 (1) : 9-21 (Febrero 2013)es_AR
dc.subjectTuberculosises_AR
dc.subjectMycobacterium bovises_AR
dc.subjectCluster Samplingeng
dc.subjectMuestreo Clusteres_AR
dc.subjectCattleeng
dc.subjectGanado Bovinoes_AR
dc.subject.otherLatin American Countrieseng
dc.subject.otherPaíses Latinoamericanoses_AR
dc.titleUnderstanding the relationship between Mycobacterium bovis spoligotypes from cattle in Latin American Countrieses_AR
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículoes_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_AR
dc.description.origenInstituto de Biotecnologíaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Zumarraga, Martin Jose. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Biotecnología; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Arriaga, Camila. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales Agrícolas y Pecuarias. Centro Nacional de Investigación Disciplinaria en Microbiología Animal; Méxicoes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Barandiaran, Soledad. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Cobos-Marín, Laura. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia; Méxicoes_AR
dc.description.filFil: de Waard, Jacobus. Universidad Central de Venezuela. Instituto de Biomedicina. Laboratorio de Tuberculosis; Venezuelaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Estrada-Garcia, Iris. Instituto Politécnico Nacional. Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas; Méxicoes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Figueiredo, Telma. Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. Laboratorio de Biologia Molecular Aplicada em Micobacterias; Brasiles_AR
dc.description.filFil: Figueroa, Alvaro. Universidad Austral de Chile. Facultad de Ciencias. Instituto de Bioquímica; Chilees_AR
dc.description.filFil: Gimenez, Francisco. Universidad Central de Venezuela. Instituto de Biomedicina. Laboratorio de Tuberculosis; Venezuelaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Gomes, Harrison M. Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. Laboratorio de Biologia Molecular Aplicada em Micobacterias; Brasiles_AR
dc.description.filFil: Gonzalez-y-Merchand, Jorge A. Instituto Politécnico Nacional. Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas; Méxicoes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Macias, Analía. Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto. Facultad de Agronomía y Veterinaria; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Milián-Suazo, Feliciano. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales Agrícolas y Pecuarias. Centro Nacional de Investigación Disciplinaria en Fisiología y Mejoramiento Animal; Méxicoes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Rodríguez, Cesar Alejandro Rosales. Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia. Departamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva e Saúde Animal; Brasiles_AR
dc.description.filFil: Santillán, Marco Antonio. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales Agrícolas y Pecuarias. Centro Nacional de Investigación Disciplinaria en Fisiología y Mejoramiento Animal; Méxicoes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Suffys, Philip Noel. Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. Laboratorio de Biologia Molecular Aplicada em Micobacterias; Brasiles_AR
dc.description.filFil: Trangoni, Marcos David. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Biotecnología; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Zarraga, Ana Maria. Universidad Austral de Chile. Facultad de Ciencias. Instituto de Bioquímica y Microbiología; Chilees_AR
dc.description.filFil: Cataldi, Angel Adrian. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Biotecnología; Argentinaes_AR
dc.subtypecientifico


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

common

Show simple item record