Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

resumen

Resumen
This paper reports a first study exploring genomic prediction for adaptation of sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] to drought‐stress (D‐ET) and non‐stress (W‐ET) environment types. The objective was to evaluate the impact of both modeling genotype‐by‐environment interaction (G × E) and accounting for heterogeneous variances of marker effects on genomic prediction of parental breeding values for grain yield within and across environment types (ET). For [ver mas...]
dc.contributor.authorVelazco, Julio Gabriel
dc.contributor.authorJordan, David R.
dc.contributor.authorHunt, Colleen H.
dc.contributor.authorMace, Emma S.
dc.contributor.authorvan Eeuwijk, Fred A.
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-23T13:29:25Z
dc.date.available2020-07-23T13:29:25Z
dc.date.issued2020-05
dc.identifier.issn1435-0653 (online)
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1002/csc2.20221
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/7601
dc.identifier.urihttps://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/csc2.20221
dc.description.abstractThis paper reports a first study exploring genomic prediction for adaptation of sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] to drought‐stress (D‐ET) and non‐stress (W‐ET) environment types. The objective was to evaluate the impact of both modeling genotype‐by‐environment interaction (G × E) and accounting for heterogeneous variances of marker effects on genomic prediction of parental breeding values for grain yield within and across environment types (ET). For this aim, different genetic covariance structures and different weights for individual markers were investigated in BLUP‐based prediction models. The BLUP models used a kinship matrix combining pedigree and genomic information, termed K‐BLUP. The dataset comprised testcross yield performances under D‐ET and W‐ET as well as pedigree and genomic data. In general, modeling G × E increased predictive ability and reduced empirical bias of genomic predictions for broad adaptation across both ETs compared to models that ignored G × E by fitting a main genetic effect only. Genomic predictions for specific adaptation to D‐ET or to W‐ET were also improved by K‐BLUP models that explicitly accommodated G × E and used data from both ETs, relative to prediction models that used data from the targeted ET exclusively or models that used all the data but assumed no G × E. Allowing for heterogeneous marker variances through weighted K‐BLUP produced clear increments (between 43% and 72%) in predictive ability of genomic prediction for grain yield in all adaptation scenarios. We conclude that G × E as well as locus‐specific genetic variances should be accommodated in genomic prediction models to improve adaptability of sorghum to variable environmental conditions.eng
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_AR
dc.language.isoenges_AR
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Agronomyes_AR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesses_AR
dc.sourceCrop Science 60 (3) : 1-33 (May -June 2020)es_AR
dc.subjectSorgoses_AR
dc.subjectSorghum Graineng
dc.subjectMejora Genéticaes_AR
dc.subjectGenetic Gaineng
dc.subjectFitomejoramientoes_AR
dc.subjectPlant Breedingeng
dc.subjectForrajeses_AR
dc.subjectForageeng
dc.titleGenomic prediction for broad and specific adaptation in sorghum accommodating differential variances of SNP effectses_AR
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículoes_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersiones_AR
dc.description.origenEEA Pergaminoes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Velazco, Julio. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Pergamino. Sección Forrajeras; Argentina. Wageningen University and Research . Biometris – Mathematical and Statistical Methods; Holandaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Jordan, David R. The University of Queensland. Hermitage Research Facility. Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation; Australiaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Hunt, Colleen H. The University of Queensland. Hermitage Research Facility. Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation; Australia. Hermitage Research Facility. Department of Agriculture and Fisheries; Australiaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Mace, Emma S. The University of Queensland. Hermitage Research Facility. Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation; Australia. Hermitage Research Facility. Department of Agriculture and Fisheries; Australiaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Eeuwijk, Fred A. van. Wageningen University and Research . Biometris – Mathematical and Statistical Methods; Holandaes_AR
dc.subtypecientifico


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

common

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem