Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

resumen

Resumen
The Southern Cone countries of Chile, Argentina and Uruguay have a common background regarding land use and land cover with a total of 46 million ha of forests whose benefits are prospering for the regional framework of the Southern Cone. The three countries do not articulate or interchange on their forest policies beyond circumstantial agreements. In this regard, and as our first research focus, we examined experiences while participating in the [ver mas...]
dc.contributor.authorLaclau, Pablo
dc.contributor.authorMeza, Andrés
dc.contributor.authorLima, Joaquín Garrido Soares de
dc.contributor.authorLinser, Stefanie
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-16T10:56:21Z
dc.date.available2019-12-16T10:56:21Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn1465-5489
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1505/146554819827293196
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/6513
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/cfa/ifr/2019/00000021/00000003/art00004
dc.description.abstractThe Southern Cone countries of Chile, Argentina and Uruguay have a common background regarding land use and land cover with a total of 46 million ha of forests whose benefits are prospering for the regional framework of the Southern Cone. The three countries do not articulate or interchange on their forest policies beyond circumstantial agreements. In this regard, and as our first research focus, we examined experiences while participating in the international Montréal Process on Criteria and Indicators for the Conservation and Management of Temperate and Boreal Forests. Secondly, we focused on the progress these processes have afforded regarding respective national implementation of criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management (C&I for SFM) and uptake in forest policy. Thirdly, we examined also the obstacles experienced during participation and implementation. We based our findings on content analysis of key documents and author observations. Albeit the institutional and political frameworks between the countries differ, we found common constraints on budgeting, limited human resources and institutional capacity. Communication to society and policy makers’ commitment are also important weaknesses. The engagement of the three countries in the Montréal Process and the application of related national sets of C&I for SFM have provided solutions to recent land use conflicts. This also strengthened the quality and effectiveness of recently approved laws and regimes for a sustainable forest management. In conclusion, the forest dialogues of these countries, within and between each other, were reinforced by participation in C&I for SFM processes, helping to bridge the gap between decision-makers, national forest agencies, academia and other forest-related stakeholders. Common indicators and related national reports facilitated the identification of affinities for regional integration on a common basis and helped to raise the level of national forest policies increasing its strength and commitment to global forest challenges. The lessons learned should be considered to reach progress towards sustainability.eng
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_AR
dc.language.isoenges_AR
dc.publisherCommonwealth Forestry Associationes_AR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesses_AR
dc.sourceInternational Forestry Review 21 (3) : 315-323 (September 2019)es_AR
dc.subjectBosqueses_AR
dc.subjectForestseng
dc.subjectIndicadoreses_AR
dc.subjectIndicatorseng
dc.subjectOrdenación Forestales_AR
dc.subjectForest Managementeng
dc.subjectAmérica del Sur
dc.subject.otherManejo Forestales_AR
dc.titleCriteria and Indicators for sustainable forest management: lessons learned in the Southern Conees_AR
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículoes_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_AR
dc.description.origenEstación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche. Agencia de Extensión Rural San Martín de los Andeses_AR
dc.description.filFil: Laclau, Pablo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche. Agencia de Extensión Rural San Martín de los Andes; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Meza, Andrés. Corporación Nacional Forestal; Chilees_AR
dc.description.filFil: Lima, Joaquín Garrido Soares de. Uruguay. Ministerio de Ganadería, Agricultura y Pesca. Dirección General Forestal; Uruguayes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Linser, Stefanie. University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences; Austria. Forest Policy Research Network. European Forest Institute; Austriaes_AR
dc.subtypecientifico


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

common

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem