Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

resumen

Resumen
During the 2000–2001 epidemic of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus (FMDV) in Argentina, two FMDV serotype A viruses were identified among others. Since different pathogenic properties between these virus strains were noticed in cattle, we evaluated several biological properties and features of FMDV A/Arg/00 and FMDV A/Arg/01 in order to compare these viruses in terms of virulence and pathogenicity. Our results indicate that FMDV A/Arg/00 grows less efficiently [ver mas...]
dc.contributor.authorGarcia Nuñez, Maria Soledad
dc.contributor.authorKonig, Guido Alberto
dc.contributor.authorBerinstein, Analia
dc.contributor.authorCarrillo, Elisa Cristina
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-13T14:03:03Z
dc.date.available2019-06-13T14:03:03Z
dc.date.issued2010-01
dc.identifier.issn0168-1702
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.virusres.2009.10.013
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168170209003864
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/5311
dc.description.abstractDuring the 2000–2001 epidemic of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus (FMDV) in Argentina, two FMDV serotype A viruses were identified among others. Since different pathogenic properties between these virus strains were noticed in cattle, we evaluated several biological properties and features of FMDV A/Arg/00 and FMDV A/Arg/01 in order to compare these viruses in terms of virulence and pathogenicity. Our results indicate that FMDV A/Arg/00 grows less efficiently than FMDV A/Arg/01, exemplified by smaller sized plaques, retarded one-step growth curves and overall low viral yields. Also, FMDV A/Arg/00 displayed the lowest specific infectivity in suckling mice requiring 50-fold more infectious particles than FMDV A/Arg/01 to generate a LD50 in suckling mice. Finally, FMDV A/Arg/00 did not cause death in adult C57Bl/6 mice even at high doses (107–106 PFU) whereas FMDV A/Arg/01 resulted lethal in doses as low as 102 PFU. Overall, we were able to demonstrate that these virus strains differ from each other in terms of virulence and pathogenicity.eng
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_AR
dc.language.isoenges_AR
dc.publisherElsevieres_AR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesses_AR
dc.sourceVirus Research 147 (1) : 149-152 (January 2010)es_AR
dc.subjectEnfermedades de los Animaleses_AR
dc.subjectAnimal Diseaseseng
dc.subjectVirus Fiebre Aftosaes_AR
dc.subjectAphthoviruseng
dc.subjectFiebre Aftosaes_AR
dc.subjectFoot and Mouth Diseaseeng
dc.subjectSerotiposes_AR
dc.subjectSerotypeseng
dc.subjectVirulenciaes_AR
dc.subjectVirulenceeng
dc.titleDifferences in the virulence of two strains of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus Serotype A with the same spatiotemporal distributiones_AR
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículoes_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_AR
dc.description.origenInstituto de Biotecnologíaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Garcia Nuñez, Maria Soledad. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Biotecnología; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Konig, Guido Alberto. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Biotecnología; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Berinstein, Analia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Biotecnología; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Carrillo, Elisa Cristina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Biotecnología; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentinaes_AR
dc.subtypecientifico


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

common

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem