Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

resumen

Resumen
Wool production oriented sheep keeping is the most important rural activity in Patagonia, Argentina, followed by goat and at a lower extent cattle production. The existing perception on the smallholder production systems from most decision makers (e.g., policy) is that they are marginal, with low productivity and have negative returns. Since the Argentinean economic scenario has changed drastically in the last decade, the aim of this study was to analyze [ver mas...]
dc.contributor.authorVillagra, Edgar Sebastian
dc.contributor.authorEasdale, Marcos Horacio
dc.contributor.authorGiraudo, Celso Gabriel
dc.contributor.authorBonvissuto, Griselda
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-20T14:17:51Z
dc.date.available2018-12-20T14:17:51Z
dc.date.issued2015-10
dc.identifier.issn0049-4747
dc.identifier.issn1573-7438
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-015-0873-9
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/4125
dc.identifier.urihttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11250-015-0873-9
dc.description.abstractWool production oriented sheep keeping is the most important rural activity in Patagonia, Argentina, followed by goat and at a lower extent cattle production. The existing perception on the smallholder production systems from most decision makers (e.g., policy) is that they are marginal, with low productivity and have negative returns. Since the Argentinean economic scenario has changed drastically in the last decade, the aim of this study was to analyze the economic and productive contribution of different livestock species in smallholdings. The results showed that the post-1990’s economic scenario turned most smallholder livestock systems to have positive economic performance, but there were still productive restrictions that limited to fully benefit from these favorable circumstances. Goats were the most profitable livestock due to their higher productive performance, followed by sheep and cattle, with poorer performances. A strong cooperation between the intervention programs and research institutions is recommended to overcome the current production bottlenecks, by focusing on cattle and sheep production systems.eng
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_AR
dc.language.isoenges_AR
dc.publisherSpringeres_AR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesses_AR
dc.sourceTropical Animal Health and Production 47 (7) : 1373–1380 (October 2015)es_AR
dc.subjectOvinoses_AR
dc.subjectSheepeng
dc.subjectCaprinoses_AR
dc.subjectGoatseng
dc.subjectGanado Bovinoes_AR
dc.subjectCattleeng
dc.subjectProducciónes_AR
dc.subjectProductioneng
dc.subjectExplotación en Pequeña Escalaes_AR
dc.subjectSmallholderseng
dc.subjectDiversificaciónes_AR
dc.subjectDiversificationeng
dc.subject.otherRegión Patagónicaes_AR
dc.titleProductive and income contributions of sheep, goat, and cattle, and different diversification schemes in smallholder production systems of Northern Patagonia, Argentinaes_AR
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículoes_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_AR
dc.description.origenEEA Barilochees_AR
dc.description.filFil: Villagra, Edgar Sebastian. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Easdale, Marcos Horacio. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estacion Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Giraudo, Celso Gabriel. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estacion Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Bonvissuto, Griselda. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bordenave; Argentinaes_AR
dc.subtypecientifico


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

common

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem