Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

resumen

Resumen
Context: Amphibians are declining worldwide and land use change to agriculture is recognized as a leading cause. Argentina is undergoing an agriculturalization process with rapid changes in landscape structure. Objectives: We evaluated anuran response to landscape composition and configuration in two landscapes of east-central Argentina with different degrees of agriculturalization. We identified sensitive species and evaluated landscape influence on [ver mas...]
dc.contributor.authorSuarez, Romina Paula
dc.contributor.authorZaccagnini, Maria Elena
dc.contributor.authorBabbitt, Kimberly J.
dc.contributor.authorCalamari, Noelia Cecilia
dc.contributor.authorNatale, Guillermo Sebastian
dc.contributor.authorCerezo, Alexis
dc.contributor.authorCodugnello, Nadia
dc.contributor.authorBoca, Rosa Teresa
dc.contributor.authorDamonte, María Jimena
dc.contributor.authorVera Candioti, Josefina
dc.contributor.authorGavier Pizarro, Gregorio Ignacio
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-28T14:08:51Z
dc.date.available2018-09-28T14:08:51Z
dc.date.issued2016-12
dc.identifier.issn0921-2973
dc.identifier.issn1572-9761
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-016-0426-2
dc.identifier.urihttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10980-016-0426-2
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/3505
dc.description.abstractContext: Amphibians are declining worldwide and land use change to agriculture is recognized as a leading cause. Argentina is undergoing an agriculturalization process with rapid changes in landscape structure. Objectives: We evaluated anuran response to landscape composition and configuration in two landscapes of east-central Argentina with different degrees of agriculturalization. We identified sensitive species and evaluated landscape influence on communities and individual species at two spatial scales. Methods: We compared anuran richness, frequency of occurrence, and activity between landscapes using call surveys data from 120 sampling points from 2007 to 2009. We evaluated anuran responses to landscape structure variables estimated within 250 and 500-m radius buffers using canonical correspondence analysis and multimodel inference from a set of candidate models. Results: Anuran richness was lower in the landscape with greater level of agriculturalization with reduced amount of forest cover and stream length. This pattern was driven by the lower occurrence and calling activity of seven out of the sixteen recorded species. Four species responded positively to the amount of forest cover and stream habitat. Three species responded positively to forest cohesion and negatively to rural housing. Two responded negatively to crop area and diversity of cover classes. Conclusions: Anurans within agricultural landscapes of east-central Argentina are responding to landscape structure. Responses varied depending on species and study scale. Life-history traits contribute to responses differences. Our study offers a better understanding of landscape effects on anurans and can be used for land management in other areas experiencing a similar agriculturalization process.eng
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_AR
dc.language.isoenges_AR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesses_AR
dc.sourceLandscape Ecology 31 (10) : 2485–2505. (December 2016)es_AR
dc.subjectAnuraes_AR
dc.subjectAnfibioses_AR
dc.subjectAmphibianseng
dc.subjectConservación del Paisajees_AR
dc.subjectLandscape Conservationeng
dc.subjectAgriculturaes_AR
dc.subjectAgricultureeng
dc.subjectIntensificaciónes_AR
dc.subjectIntensificationeng
dc.subject.otherArgentinaes_AR
dc.subject.otherAnuroses_AR
dc.subject.otherAgriculturizaciónes_AR
dc.titleAnuran responses to spatial patterns of agricultural landscapes in Argentinaes_AR
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículoes_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_AR
dc.description.origenInstituto de Recursos Biológicoses_AR
dc.description.filFil: Suarez, Romina Paula. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Recursos Biológicos; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Zaccagnini, Maria Elena. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Recursos Biológicos; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Babbitt, Kimberly J. University of New Hampshire. Department of Natural Resources and the Environment; Estados Unidoses_AR
dc.description.filFil: Calamari, Noelia Cecilia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Paraná; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Natale, Guillermo S. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas. Departamento de Química. Centro de Investigaciones del Medio Ambiente; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Cerezo, Alexis. Asociación Aves Argentinas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Métodos Cuantitativos; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Codugnello, Nadia. Universidad Nacional de Luján. Laboratorio de Ecología; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Boca, Rosa Teresa. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Clima y Agua; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Damonte, María Jimena. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Recursos Biológicos; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Vera Candioti, Josefina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Oliveros. Agencia De Extensión Rural Venado Tuerto; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Gavier Pizarro, Gregorio Ignacio. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Recursos Biológicos; Argentinaes_AR
dc.subtypecientifico


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

common

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem