Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

resumen

Resumen
In olive hedgerows mechanical pruning is needed to control hedgerow dimensions for canopy illumination and access by harvesting machinery but yield responses to pruning strategies remain unclear. This study records the impact of annual mechanical topping with pruning on alternating sides of hedgerows on the internal distribution of fruit characteristics and oil yield. Hedging was applied in winter at 0.4 m from the trunk on West and East sides in 2015–16 [ver mas...]
dc.contributor.authorTrentacoste, Eduardo Rafael
dc.contributor.authorCalderon Diaz, Facundo Javier
dc.contributor.authorPuertas, Carlos Marcelo
dc.contributor.authorBanco, Adriana Pamela
dc.contributor.authorContreras Zanessi, Octavio Ramiro
dc.contributor.authorGalarza, Walter Antonio
dc.contributor.authorConnor, David J.
dc.coverage.spatialSan Juan (province)
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-26T12:10:45Z
dc.date.available2018-06-26T12:10:45Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn0304-4238
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.06.045
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/2679
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304423818304370
dc.description.abstractIn olive hedgerows mechanical pruning is needed to control hedgerow dimensions for canopy illumination and access by harvesting machinery but yield responses to pruning strategies remain unclear. This study records the impact of annual mechanical topping with pruning on alternating sides of hedgerows on the internal distribution of fruit characteristics and oil yield. Hedging was applied in winter at 0.4 m from the trunk on West and East sides in 2015–16 and 2016–17 seasons, respectively, along with topping at 3.0 m height. Hedgerow width, height and porosity were characterized after pruning and before harvest. Oil production, fruit number and fruit characteristics were evaluated in 20 positions within the hedgerows defined by two sides (East and West), two depths per side (inner and outer) and 5 heights. West-unpruned sides in 2015–16 and East-unpruned sides in 2016–17 produced 70 and 80% of the total oil, respectively. Within each season, fruit oil and water concentration and pulp/pit ratio were similar on opposing sides. In contrast, fruit weight and maturity were similar between sides in 2015–16 but not in 2016–17 where greater fruit weight and more advanced maturity were observed on West-pruned. In both seasons, inner positions (within 0.5 m of trunk) produced 65% of total oil production and fruit numbers. Fruits showed similar characteristics between hedgerow depths. In contrast, oil production and fruit characteristics showed a marked gradient with height. Oil production and fruit number were greatest from 1.0 to 2.0 m height, decreasing to the top and to the base. Fruit weight, oil concentration and maturity decreased from hedgerow top to base, while fruit water concentration showed the opposite pattern. Mechanical pruning applied annually to alternating sides maintained both hedgerow dimensions and oil yield in successive years.eng
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_AR
dc.language.isoenges_AR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesses_AR
dc.sourceScientia Horticulturae 240 : 425–429 (2018)es_AR
dc.subjectOlea Europaeaes_AR
dc.subjectVariedadeses_AR
dc.subjectVarietieseng
dc.subjectPlantas para Cercas Vivases_AR
dc.subjectHedging Plantseng
dc.subjectAceiteses_AR
dc.subjectOilseng
dc.subjectRendimientoes_AR
dc.subjectYieldseng
dc.subjectPodaes_AR
dc.subjectPruningeng
dc.subject.otherSan Juanes_AR
dc.titleVegetative structure and distribution of oil yield components and fruit characteristics within olive hedgerows (cv. Arbosana) mechanically pruned annually on alternating sides in San Juan, Argentinaes_AR
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículoes_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_AR
dc.description.origenEEA Junínes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Trentacoste, Eduardo Rafael. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Junín; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Calderon, Facundo J. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Junín; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Puertas, Carlos Marcelo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Junín; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Banco, Adriana Pamela. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Junín; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Contreras Zanessi, Octavio Ramiro. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Junín; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Galarza, Walter Antonio. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Junín; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Connor, David J. University of Melbourne. Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences; Australiaes_AR
dc.subtypecientifico


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

common

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem