Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

resumen

Resumen
The effect of row spacing on fruit characteristics and production was studied in two super-high density olive hedgerow orchards planted at three row spacings (5.0, 4.0 and 2.5 m) with the same intra-row tree spacing, one with rows N–S and the other E–W. For both row orientations, reduction of spacing from 5.0 to 4.0 and 2.5 m added on average 39 and 107% more canopy volume and external surface area per hectare, respectively. In N–S hedgerows, cumulative [ver mas...]
dc.contributor.authorTrentacoste, Eduardo Rafael
dc.contributor.authorConnor, David J.
dc.contributor.authorGómez del Campo, María
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-21T13:49:26Z
dc.date.available2018-06-21T13:49:26Z
dc.date.issued2015-09-22
dc.identifier.issn0304-4238
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.07.013
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/2667
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304423815300893
dc.description.abstractThe effect of row spacing on fruit characteristics and production was studied in two super-high density olive hedgerow orchards planted at three row spacings (5.0, 4.0 and 2.5 m) with the same intra-row tree spacing, one with rows N–S and the other E–W. For both row orientations, reduction of spacing from 5.0 to 4.0 and 2.5 m added on average 39 and 107% more canopy volume and external surface area per hectare, respectively. In N–S hedgerows, cumulative oil production per ha during the first five years increased significantly by 14 and 52% in 4.0- and 2.5-m relative to 5.0-m spacing. In E–W hedgerows, accumulated oil production per ha did not respond to row spacing. The explanation was found in significantly fewer fruits per unit length of hedgerow and smaller oil content at 2.5 m than 5.0 m spacing in E–W but not in N–S. In N–S hedgerows, there were no differences in oil production and fruit characteristics between opposing sides in all row spacings. In E–W hedgerows spaced at 5.0 m, fruit characteristics were similar between opposing sides, but at 4.0 m and 2.5 m spacings, fruits on S sides were heavier and more mature than on N sides, revealing the impact of lower transmission of irradiance through the hedgerow in closer spacings. Optimal spacing for maximum production depends on row orientation. In N–S hedgerows, the most productive orchard, during the first five years was that planted at 2.5 m, but in E–W hedgerows 5.0 m spacing was the more profitable option.eng
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_AR
dc.language.isoenges_AR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesses_AR
dc.sourceScientia Horticulturae 193 : 240-248 (September 2015)es_AR
dc.subjectOlea Europaeaes_AR
dc.subjectAceitunaes_AR
dc.subjectOliveseng
dc.subjectEspaciamientoes_AR
dc.subjectSpacingeng
dc.subjectPlantas para Cercas Vivases_AR
dc.subjectHedging Plantseng
dc.subjectHuerto Frutales_AR
dc.subjectOrchardses_AR
dc.subjectOrientación
dc.subjectOrientationeng
dc.subject.otherDensidad de Plantaciónes_AR
dc.titleEffect of row spacing on vegetative structure, fruit characteristics and oil productivity of N–S and E–W oriented olive hedgerowses_AR
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículoes_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_AR
dc.description.origenEEA Junínes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Trentacoste, Eduardo Rafael. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Departamento de Producción Agraria; España. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Junín; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Connor, David J. University of Melbourne. Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences; Australiaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Gómez del Campo, María. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Departamento de Producción Agraria; Españaes_AR
dc.subtypecientifico


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

common

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem