Show simple item record

resumen

Abstract
In recent decades agroforestry has undergone significant development in Latin America. South America generates the most scientific research on the topic in the region. We conducted a comprehensive review and analysis of knowledge production for South American agroforestry that includes livestock grazing, known as agrosilvopastoralism (AS), examining how different sociopolitical factors such as sources of funding, institutional priorities, and [ver mas...]
dc.contributor.authorSoler Esteban, Rosina Matilde
dc.contributor.authorPeri, Pablo Luis
dc.contributor.authorBahamonde, Héctor Alejandro
dc.contributor.authorGargaglione, Veronica Beatriz
dc.contributor.authorOrmaechea, Sebastián Gabriel
dc.contributor.authorHuertas Herrera, Alejandro
dc.contributor.authorSánchez Jardón, Laura
dc.contributor.authorLorenzo, Cristian
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Pastur, Guillermo José
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-05T14:26:55Z
dc.date.available2018-06-05T14:26:55Z
dc.date.issued2018-02
dc.identifier.issn1550-7424
dc.identifier.issn1551-5028
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2017.12.006
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S155074241730180X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/2552
dc.description.abstractIn recent decades agroforestry has undergone significant development in Latin America. South America generates the most scientific research on the topic in the region. We conducted a comprehensive review and analysis of knowledge production for South American agroforestry that includes livestock grazing, known as agrosilvopastoralism (AS), examining how different sociopolitical factors such as sources of funding, institutional priorities, and international cooperation can bias the direction and objectives of scientific research. We assessed the major attributes of scientific publications on the topic (25 articles per country; overall n = 210) and the potential factors underlying the processes of research and development in the region. The tree component was the most studied, while the livestock component received less attention. Studies were mainly focused on the production of goods and services (monetary or nonmonetary approaches), except in Brazil, where conservation was the major study objective. Stakeholders were involved in more than half of the studies (60%), and they were mostly ranchers and local producers. More than half (70%) of the studies offered recommendations based on their results, and such recommendations were mostly concerned with the management of agrosilvopastoral system components. In general, studies were led just as often by local as foreign first authors and coauthored by more than three people as part of interinstitutional working groups. Brazil, Argentina, Colombia, and Chile had more frequent cooperation among institutions and countries but mainly used their own funding. In contrast, Bolivia, Ecuador, and Peru had almost 100% of their studies supported by foreign countries (North America and Europe). Countries with greater internal funding of research generated more long-term studies. Besides this, two clear trends were detected: 1) conservation and social aspects were mainly supported by sources from external countries led by foreign principal investigators, and 2) production issues were supported from sources within countries and supported high levels of cooperation among institutions.eng
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_AR
dc.language.isoenges_AR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesses_AR
dc.sourceRangeland ecology & management. (7 February 2018)es_AR
dc.subjectSistemas Agrosilvopascícolases_AR
dc.subjectAgrosilvopastoral Systemseng
dc.subjectAgroforesteriaes_AR
dc.subjectAgroforestryeng
dc.subjectSistemas de Conocimiento e Informaciónes_AR
dc.subjectKnowledge and Information Systemseng
dc.subject.otherAmérica del Sures_AR
dc.titleAssessing Knowledge Production for Agrosilvopastoral Systems in South Americaes_AR
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículoes_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersiones_AR
dc.description.origenEEA Santa Cruzes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Soler Esteban, Rosina Matilde. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Cientificas; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santa Cruz; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Bahamonde, Héctor Alejandro. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santa Cruz; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral; Argentina.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: Gargaglione, Veronica Beatriz. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santa Cruz; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Ormaechea, Sebastián Gabriel. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santa Cruz; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Huertas Herrera, Alejandro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Cientificas; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Sánchez Jardón, Laura. Universidad Complutense de Madrir. Department of Ecology; Españaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Lorenzo, Cristian. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Cientificas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tierra del Fuego; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Cientificas; Argentinaes_AR
dc.subtypecientifico


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

common

Show simple item record