Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

resumen

Resumen
The aim of this work was to comparatively evaluate the evolution of resistance in Rhipicephalus microplus tick populations exposed to successive treatments with monodrug-based formulations and combinations of them in the same commercial formulation. Thirty-six heifers, naturally infested with R. microplus, were divided into three groups (G) and subjected to three successive treatments, on days 0 (Nov-2021), 43 (Jan-2022) and 78 (Feb-2022), with the [ver mas...]
dc.contributor.authorSarli, Macarena
dc.contributor.authorTorrents, Jorgelina
dc.contributor.authorToffaletti, Jose Rodolfo
dc.contributor.authorMorel, Nicolas
dc.contributor.authorNava, Santiago
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-12T14:10:29Z
dc.date.available2024-01-12T14:10:29Z
dc.date.issued2023-11
dc.identifier.issn0034-5288
dc.identifier.issn1532-2661
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2023.105040
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/16543
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034528823002916
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this work was to comparatively evaluate the evolution of resistance in Rhipicephalus microplus tick populations exposed to successive treatments with monodrug-based formulations and combinations of them in the same commercial formulation. Thirty-six heifers, naturally infested with R. microplus, were divided into three groups (G) and subjected to three successive treatments, on days 0 (Nov-2021), 43 (Jan-2022) and 78 (Feb-2022), with the following formulations: I) ivermectin 3.15% (Ivomec Gold®) (GI), II) fipronil 1% (Ectoline®) (GII) and III) a combination of fipronil 2% and ivermectin 1% (Vaquero®) (GIII). From Nov-2021 to Dec-2022, counts of R. microplus were periodically performed to evaluate the tick infestation. Engorged females were collected at the beginning and end of the trial to determine the evolution of tick resistance to ivermectin and fipronil by in vitro bioassays. At the end of trial, GII and GIII had higher tick counts (39.18 ± 11.88 and 38.33 ± 14.31, respectively) than group I (5.11 ± 6.24) (P<0.05). The in vitro results shows that the resistance ratio (RR50) values after the treatments were higher for fipronil (5.584 and 5.649 for GII and GIII, respectively) than for ivermectin (1.165 and 1.088 for GI and GIII, respectively). In the group treated with the combination (GIII), the RR50 increased for both drugs simultaneously. These results suggest that the successive use of drug combinations could exacerbate the problem of multi-resistance of R. microplus to chemical acaricides.eng
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_AR
dc.language.isoenges_AR
dc.publisherElsevieres_AR
dc.relationinfo:eu-repograntAgreement/INTA/2019-PE-E5-I109-001, Convocatoria: Estudios para el control de enfermedades subtropicales y/o transmitidas por vectores (Tristeza Bovina, Garrapatas, Miasis, Tripanosomiasis, Lengua Azul y la
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesses_AR
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/es_AR
dc.sourceResearch in Veterinary Science 164 : 105040. (November 2023)es_AR
dc.subjectRhipicephaluses_AR
dc.subjectAcaricidases_AR
dc.subjectAcaricideseng
dc.subjectResistencia a los Acaricidases_AR
dc.subjectResistance to Acaricideseng
dc.subjectGanado Bovinoes_AR
dc.subjectCattleeng
dc.subjectMezcla de Medicamentoses_AR
dc.subjectDrug Combinationseng
dc.subject.otherRhipicephalus micropluses_AR
dc.subject.otherGarrapatases_AR
dc.subject.otherTickseng
dc.titleEvaluation of the impact of successive acaricide treatments on resistance evolution in Rhipicephalus microplus populations: Monodrugs versus drug combinationses_AR
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículoes_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_AR
dc.rights.licenseCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)es_AR
dc.description.origenEEA Rafaelaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Sarli, Macarena. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela. Instituto de Investigación de la Cadena Láctea (IdICaL); Argentina.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: Sarli, Macarena. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Investigación de la Cadena Láctea (IDICAL); Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Torrents, Jorgelina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela. Instituto de Investigación de la Cadena Láctea (IdICaL); Argentina.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: Torrents, Jorgelina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Investigación de la Cadena Láctea (IDICAL); Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Torrents, Jorgelina. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Toffaletti, Jose Rodolfo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria El Colorado; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Morel, Nicolas. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela. Instituto de Investigación de la Cadena Láctea (IDICAL); Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Morel, Nicolas. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Investigación de la Cadena Láctea (IDICAL); Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Nava, Santiago. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela. Instituto de Investigación de la Cadena Láctea (IDICAL); Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Nava, Santiago. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Investigación de la Cadena Láctea (IDICAL); Argentinaes_AR
dc.subtypecientifico


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

common

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess