Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Instagram
    • español
    • English
  • Contacto
  •  
    • español
    • English
  • Mi Cuenta
Acerca deAutoresTítulosTemasColeccionesComunidades☰
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
Ver ítem 
    xmlui.general.dspace_homeCentros Regionales y EEAsCentro Regional Patagonia SurEEA Santa CruzArtículos científicosxmlui.ArtifactBrowser.ItemViewer.trail
  • Inicio
  • Centros Regionales y EEAs
  • Centro Regional Patagonia Sur
  • EEA Santa Cruz
  • Artículos científicos
  • Ver ítem

Biomass, carbon and nutrient storage for dominant grasses of cold temperate steppe grasslands in southern Patagonia, Argentina

Resumen
We hypothesized that different dominant grasses species display contrasting nutrient accumulation, allocation and conservation strategies. Also, we expect a distinctive pattern of carbon and biomass partitioning according to plant sizes. The aim was to quantify the amount of biomass, carbon and nutrients in both above- and belowground components for four dominant grasses in grasslands steppe. We analyzed biomass, carbon and nutrients (N, P, K, Ca, Mg and [ver mas...]
We hypothesized that different dominant grasses species display contrasting nutrient accumulation, allocation and conservation strategies. Also, we expect a distinctive pattern of carbon and biomass partitioning according to plant sizes. The aim was to quantify the amount of biomass, carbon and nutrients in both above- and belowground components for four dominant grasses in grasslands steppe. We analyzed biomass, carbon and nutrients (N, P, K, Ca, Mg and S) of each dominant grass species corresponding to different sizes and separated in components (green and senesced leaves, pseudostem, and fine and coarse roots). Total biomass accumulation for individual grass plants was affected by plant size and species and ranged from 15.4 to 684 g dry matter plant1. The biomass root/shoot ratio ranged from 0.28 to 3.40. Total nutrient concentration generally graded in all species the following order: green leaves > fine roots > pseudostem > coarse roots > senesced leaves. Storage of any particular nutrient varied depending mainly on species. Mean nutrient resorption efficiency varied according to the growing season and specie being maximum for K and minimum for Mg. The equations developed for individual grass plants could be used to assist quantitative predictions of biomass, carbon and nutrient accumulation per hectare. [Cerrar]
Thumbnail
Autor
Peri, Pablo Luis;   Lasagno, Romina Gisele;  
Fuente
Journal of Arid Environments 74 (1) : 23-34. (January 2010)
Fecha
2010-01
Editorial
Elsevier
ISSN
0140-1963
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/13044
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140196309001840
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2009.06.015
Formato
pdf
Tipo de documento
artículo
Palabras Claves
Grasses; Pastos; Steppes; Estepas; Nutrients; Nutrientes; Biomass; Biomasa; Carbon; Carbono; Santa Cruz; Nutrient Concentration; Concentración de Nutrientes; Nutrient Resorption Efficiency; Eficiencia de Reabsorción de Nutrientes; Plant Size; Tamaño de Planta; Root/shoot Ratio; Relación Raíz/tallo; Región Patagónica;
Derechos de acceso
Restringido
Descargar
Compartir
  • Compartir
    Facebook Email Twitter Mendeley
Excepto donde se diga explicitamente, este item se publica bajo la siguiente descripción: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Unported (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5)
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítem