Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

resumen

Resumen
Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) has been rated as moderately salt‐resistant, and variability for salt resistance has been detected within this crop. However, variability in salt‐resistance mechanisms has not been assessed. Osmotic tolerance, the relation of salt resistance with whole‐plant Na+ and K+ distribution and tissue Na+ tolerance were investigated in several sunflower inbred lines. Plants were grown under controlled conditions, in pots with sand [ver mas...]
dc.contributor.authorCeccoli, Gabriel
dc.contributor.authorSenn, Eugenia
dc.contributor.authorBustos, Dolores Angela
dc.contributor.authorOrtega, Leandro Ismael
dc.contributor.authorCórdoba, Alicia R.
dc.contributor.authorVegetti, Abelardo Carlos
dc.contributor.authorTaleisnik, Edith
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-23T14:17:46Z
dc.date.available2020-06-23T14:17:46Z
dc.date.issued2012-12
dc.identifier.issn1522-2624
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.201200303
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/7459
dc.identifier.urihttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jpln.201200303
dc.description.abstractSunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) has been rated as moderately salt‐resistant, and variability for salt resistance has been detected within this crop. However, variability in salt‐resistance mechanisms has not been assessed. Osmotic tolerance, the relation of salt resistance with whole‐plant Na+ and K+ distribution and tissue Na+ tolerance were investigated in several sunflower inbred lines. Plants were grown under controlled conditions, in pots with sand and perlite irrigated with salinized (NaCl, –0.65 MPa) nutrient solution. Osmotic tolerance was assessed from the initial effects of the salt treatment on plant elongation in eleven sunflower lines. Long‐term salinity responses were evaluated in four of those lines, by assessing whole‐plant growth. A principal components analysis (PCA) was run on relative‐to‐control growth data, and this information was used to establish a relative resistance ranking, which indicated lines HAR2 > HAR1 > HA64 > HAR5. Osmotic tolerance was observed in HA64 and HAR2. The lines showed different degrees of Na+ accumulation, it was very low in some of them, but relative salt resistance was not associated to this trait. Tissue Na+ tolerance was deduced by comparing the percentage of dead leaves as a function of leaf blade Na+ accumulation, and it was higher in HAR1 than in the rest. These results indicate that variability for salt‐resistance mechanisms exists in sunflower. Osmotic tolerance and tissue Na+ tolerance were detected in different lines, highlighting that such variability may be exploited for increasing salt resistance in this crop.eng
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_AR
dc.language.isoenges_AR
dc.publisherWileyes_AR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesses_AR
dc.sourceJournal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 175 (6) : 882-890 (December 2012)es_AR
dc.subjectHelianthus annuuses_AR
dc.subjectVariación Genéticaes_AR
dc.subjectGenetic Variationeng
dc.subjectTolerancia a la Sales_AR
dc.subjectSalt Toleranceeng
dc.subjectEstrés Osmóticoes_AR
dc.subjectOsmotic Stresseng
dc.subject.otherGirasoles_AR
dc.subject.otherSunflowereng
dc.subject.otherEstrés Salinoes_AR
dc.titleGenetic variability for responses to short‐ and long‐term salt stress in vegetative sunflower plantses_AR
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículoes_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_AR
dc.description.origenInstituto de Fisiología y Recursos Genéticos Vegetaleses_AR
dc.description.filFil: Ceccoli, Gabriel. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Senn, María Eugenia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Fisiología y Recursos Genéticos Vegetales(ex IFFIVE); Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Bustos, Dolores Angela. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Fisiología y Recursos Genéticos Vegetales; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Ortega, Leandro Ismael. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Fisiología y Recursos Genéticos Vegetales (ex IFFIVE); Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Córdoba, Alicia R. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Fisiología y Recursos Genéticos Vegetales (ex IFFIVE); Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Vegetti, Abelardo Carlos. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Taleisnik, Edith. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Fisiología y Recursos Genéticos Vegetales (ex IFFIVE); Argentinaes_AR
dc.subtypecientifico


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

common

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem