View Item
- xmlui.general.dspace_homeCentros Regionales y EEAsCentro Regional Patagonia SurEEA Santa CruzArtículos científicosxmlui.ArtifactBrowser.ItemViewer.trail
- DSpace Home
- Centros Regionales y EEAs
- Centro Regional Patagonia Sur
- EEA Santa Cruz
- Artículos científicos
- View Item
Variation of grazing‐induced vegetation changes across a large‐scale productivity gradient
Abstract
Questions: Does the magnitude of grazing‐induced changes in species composition vary with habitat productivity? How does the sign and magnitude of grazing effects on species richness and beta‐diversity change with increasing productivity? Do major life forms exhibit consistent responses to grazing along productivity gradients?
Location: Steppes and grasslands of southern South America in Argentina and Uruguay.
Methods: We evaluated grazing effects on
[ver mas...]
Questions: Does the magnitude of grazing‐induced changes in species composition vary with habitat productivity? How does the sign and magnitude of grazing effects on species richness and beta‐diversity change with increasing productivity? Do major life forms exhibit consistent responses to grazing along productivity gradients?
Location: Steppes and grasslands of southern South America in Argentina and Uruguay.
Methods: We evaluated grazing effects on plant composition, species richness, beta‐diversity and life‐form abundances along a ten‐fold, regional productivity gradient and within subregions of contrasting productivity, using a common sampling protocol for 23 paired grazed vs ungrazed plots. The annual integral of the normalized difference vegetation index was used as a surrogate for above‐ground net primary productivity.
Results: Compositional dissimilarity between grazed and ungrazed plots, as well as grazing‐induced differences in plant richness and beta‐diversity all increased with habitat productivity. Grazing decreased species richness in low‐productive steppes but enhanced the richness of high‐productive grasslands. On average, grazing reduced beta‐diversity in high‐productive sites but not in low‐productive sites. Dominant species were more strongly suppressed by grazing towards productive grasslands. Grazing generally decreased shrub species cover, whereas graminoid and forb cover did not consistently change with grazing through the productivity gradient.
Conclusions: Our results indicate that the overall grazing effects on vegetation structure increased along a regional productivity gradient. Yet the sign of grazing impacts on species richness and beta‐diversity shifted with habitat productivity, in agreement with models of herbivore‐mediated co‐existence and species colonization in productive systems. Further, we found that narrowing the spatial extent of analysis to the subregion generally obscured grazing–productivity relationships. Biodiversity conservation programmes should carefully weigh the varied impacts of livestock grazing across productivity gradients.
[Cerrar]
![Thumbnail](/bitstream/handle/20.500.12123/4641/jvs.2013.25.issue-1.cover.jpg?sequence=3&isAllowed=y)
Author
Lezama, Felipe;
Baeza, Santiago;
Altesor, Alice;
Cesa, Ariela;
Chaneton, Enrique José;
Paruelo, José María;
Fuente
Journal of Vegetation Science 25 (1) : 8-21 (January 2014)
Date
2014-01
Editorial
Wiley
ISSN
1100-9233
1654-1103
1654-1103
Formato
pdf
Tipo de documento
artículo
Palabras Claves
Derechos de acceso
Restringido
![](../../themes/Mirage2/images/cc-by-nc-sa.png)