Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

resumen

Resumen
Questions: Does the magnitude of grazing‐induced changes in species composition vary with habitat productivity? How does the sign and magnitude of grazing effects on species richness and beta‐diversity change with increasing productivity? Do major life forms exhibit consistent responses to grazing along productivity gradients? Location: Steppes and grasslands of southern South America in Argentina and Uruguay. Methods: We evaluated grazing effects on [ver mas...]
dc.contributor.authorLezama, Felipe
dc.contributor.authorBaeza, Santiago
dc.contributor.authorAltesor, Alice
dc.contributor.authorCesa, Ariela
dc.contributor.authorChaneton, Enrique José
dc.contributor.authorParuelo, José María
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-18T16:49:50Z
dc.date.available2019-03-18T16:49:50Z
dc.date.issued2014-01
dc.identifier.issn1100-9233
dc.identifier.issn1654-1103
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12053
dc.identifier.urihttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jvs.12053
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/4641
dc.description.abstractQuestions: Does the magnitude of grazing‐induced changes in species composition vary with habitat productivity? How does the sign and magnitude of grazing effects on species richness and beta‐diversity change with increasing productivity? Do major life forms exhibit consistent responses to grazing along productivity gradients? Location: Steppes and grasslands of southern South America in Argentina and Uruguay. Methods: We evaluated grazing effects on plant composition, species richness, beta‐diversity and life‐form abundances along a ten‐fold, regional productivity gradient and within subregions of contrasting productivity, using a common sampling protocol for 23 paired grazed vs ungrazed plots. The annual integral of the normalized difference vegetation index was used as a surrogate for above‐ground net primary productivity. Results: Compositional dissimilarity between grazed and ungrazed plots, as well as grazing‐induced differences in plant richness and beta‐diversity all increased with habitat productivity. Grazing decreased species richness in low‐productive steppes but enhanced the richness of high‐productive grasslands. On average, grazing reduced beta‐diversity in high‐productive sites but not in low‐productive sites. Dominant species were more strongly suppressed by grazing towards productive grasslands. Grazing generally decreased shrub species cover, whereas graminoid and forb cover did not consistently change with grazing through the productivity gradient. Conclusions: Our results indicate that the overall grazing effects on vegetation structure increased along a regional productivity gradient. Yet the sign of grazing impacts on species richness and beta‐diversity shifted with habitat productivity, in agreement with models of herbivore‐mediated co‐existence and species colonization in productive systems. Further, we found that narrowing the spatial extent of analysis to the subregion generally obscured grazing–productivity relationships. Biodiversity conservation programmes should carefully weigh the varied impacts of livestock grazing across productivity gradients.eng
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_AR
dc.language.isoenges_AR
dc.publisherWileyes_AR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesses_AR
dc.sourceJournal of Vegetation Science 25 (1) : 8-21 (January 2014)es_AR
dc.subjectBiodiversidades_AR
dc.subjectBiodiversityeng
dc.subjectPraderases_AR
dc.subjectGrasslandseng
dc.subjectPastoreoes_AR
dc.subjectGrazingeng
dc.subjectProductividades_AR
dc.subjectProductivityeng
dc.subjectVegetaciónes_AR
dc.subjectVegetationeng
dc.subject.otherRegión Patagónicaes_AR
dc.subject.otherUruguayes_AR
dc.titleVariation of grazing‐induced vegetation changes across a large‐scale productivity gradientes_AR
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículoes_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_AR
dc.description.origenEEA Santa Cruzes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Lezama, Felipe. Universidad de la República. Facultad de Agronomía. Unidad de Sistemas Ambientales; Uruguayes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Baeza, Santiago. Universidad de la República. Facultad de Agronomía. Unidad de Sistemas Ambientales; Uruguayes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Altesor, Alice. Universidad de la República. Facultad de Ciencias. Instituto de Ecología y Ciencias Ambientales; Uruguayes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Cesa, Ariela. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santa Cruz; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Chaneton, Enrique Jose. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomia; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Paruelo, José María. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura. Departamento de Métodos Cuantitativos y Sistemas de Información. Laboratorio de Análisis Regional y Teledetección; Argentinaes_AR
dc.subtypecientifico


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

common

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem