Ver ítem
- xmlui.general.dspace_homeCentros Regionales y EEAsCentro Regional Patagonia NorteEEA BarilocheArtículos científicosxmlui.ArtifactBrowser.ItemViewer.trail
- Inicio
- Centros Regionales y EEAs
- Centro Regional Patagonia Norte
- EEA Bariloche
- Artículos científicos
- Ver ítem
Economic costs of invasive non-native species in urban areas: an underexplored financial drain
Resumen
Urbanization is an important driver of global change associated with a set of environmental modifications that affect the introduction and distribution of invasive non-native species (species with populations transported by humans beyond their natural biogeographic range that established and are spreading in their introduced range; hereafter, invasive species). These species are recognized as a cause of large ecological and economic losses. Nevertheless,
[ver mas...]
Urbanization is an important driver of global change associated with a set of environmental modifications that affect the introduction and distribution of invasive non-native species (species with populations transported by humans beyond their natural biogeographic range that established and are spreading in their introduced range; hereafter, invasive species). These species are recognized as a cause of large ecological and economic losses. Nevertheless, the economic impacts of these species in urban areas are still poorly understood. Here we present a synthesis of the reported economic costs of invasive species in urban areas using the global InvaCost database, and demonstrate that costs are likely underestimated. Sixty-one invasive species have been reported to cause a cumulative cost of US$ 326.7 billion in urban areas between 1965 and 2021 globally (average annual cost of US$ 5.7 billion). Class Insecta was responsible for >99 % of reported costs (US$ 324.4 billion), followed by Aves (US$ 1.4 billion), and Magnoliopsida (US$ 494 million). The reported costs were highly uneven with the sum of the five costliest species representing 80 % of reported costs. Most reported costs were a result of damage (77.3 %), principally impacting public and social welfare (77.9 %) and authorities-stakeholders (20.7 %), and were almost entirely in terrestrial environments (99.9 %). We found costs reported for 24 countries. Yet, there are 73 additional countries with no reported costs, but with occurrences of invasive species that have reported costs in other countries. Although covering a relatively small area of the Earth's surface, urban areas represent about 15 % of the total reported costs attributed to invasive species. These results highlight the conservative nature of the estimates and impacts, revealing important biases present in the evaluation and publication of reported data on costs. We emphasize the urgent need for more focused assessments of invasive species' economic impacts in urban areas.
[Cerrar]
Autor
Heringer, Gustavo;
Fernandez, Romina Daiana;
Bang, Alok;
Cordonnier, Marion;
Novoa, Ana;
Lenzner, Bernd;
Capinha, César;
Renault, David;
Roiz, David;
Moodley, Desika;
Tricarico, Elena;
Holenstein, Kathrin;
Kourantidou, Melina;
Kirichenko, Natalia I.;
Adelino, José Ricardo Pires;
Dimarco, Romina Daniela;
Bodey, Thomas W.;
Watari, Yuya;
Courchamp, Franck;
Fuente
Science of The Total Environment 917 : 170336. (March 2024)
Fecha
2024-03
Editorial
Elsevier
ISSN
0048-9697
1879-1026
1879-1026
Formato
pdf
Tipo de documento
artículo
Palabras Claves
Derechos de acceso
Abierto
Excepto donde se diga explicitamente, este item se publica bajo la siguiente descripción: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Unported (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5)