Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

resumen

Resumen
Soil microbiological and chemical aspects were evaluated to determine the effects of conservation tillage and crop rotation on soil fertility over a 16-year period. A field trial was established to compare two cropping systems (continuous soybean and maize/soybean, soybean/maize rotation). In addition, maize (Zea mays L.) and soybean (Glycine max L., Merr) were grown in two different tillage systems: no tillage and reduced tillage. Soil populations of [ver mas...]
dc.contributor.authorVargas Gil, Silvina
dc.contributor.authorMeriles, José Manuel
dc.contributor.authorConforto, Erica Cinthia
dc.contributor.authorFigoni, Gervasio Jose
dc.contributor.authorBasanta, Maria
dc.contributor.authorLovera, Edgar Francisco
dc.contributor.authorMarch, Guillermo Juan
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-21T16:37:43Z
dc.date.available2021-07-21T16:37:43Z
dc.date.issued2008-11-19
dc.identifier.issn0959-3993
dc.identifier.issn1573-0972 (online)
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-008-9908-y
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/9859
dc.identifier.urihttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11274-008-9908-y
dc.description.abstractSoil microbiological and chemical aspects were evaluated to determine the effects of conservation tillage and crop rotation on soil fertility over a 16-year period. A field trial was established to compare two cropping systems (continuous soybean and maize/soybean, soybean/maize rotation). In addition, maize (Zea mays L.) and soybean (Glycine max L., Merr) were grown in two different tillage systems: no tillage and reduced tillage. Soil populations of Trichoderma spp., Gliocladium spp. and total fungi were more abundant when maize or soybean were under conservation tillage and in the maize/soybean and soybean/maize rotation, than in continuous soybean. Furthermore, higher levels of microbial respiration and fluorescein diacetate hydrolysis (FDA), were recorded under no tillage systems. However, soil counts of Actinomycetes and Pythium spp., and Pythium diversity together with soil microbial biomass were not affected by the field treatments. To establish a correlation with soil biological factors, soil chemical parameters, such as pH, organic matter content, total N, electrical conductivity, N–NO3 − and P were also quantified, most of the correlations being significantly positive. Under no tillage there was a clear increase of the amount of crop residues and the C and N soil content due to the presence of residues. Also the distribution of crop residues in surface soil due to zero tillage and the quality of these residues, depending on the crop rotation employed, improved on soil biological and chemical characteristics. Crop yield was also enhanced by zero tillage through the management of residues. Although yield values were not directly associated with the development of microorganisms, both yield and microorganisms were influenced by crop management. These results suggest that measuring soil properties over a long period helps to define effective management strategies in order to preserve soil conditions.eng
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_AR
dc.language.isoenges_AR
dc.publisherSpringeres_AR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesses_AR
dc.sourceWorld Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 25 : 439–448 (2009)es_AR
dc.subjectCrop Rotationeng
dc.subjectSoil Qualityeng
dc.subjectSueloes_AR
dc.subjectRotación de Cultivoses_AR
dc.subjectSoileng
dc.subjectCalidad del Suelo
dc.subject.otherMicrobial Communitieseng
dc.subject.otherChemical Parameterseng
dc.subject.otherSoil Healtheng
dc.subject.otherTillage Systemseng
dc.titleField assessment of soil biological and chemical quality in response to crop management practiceses_AR
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículoes_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_AR
dc.description.origenInstituto de Patología Vegetales_AR
dc.description.filFil: Vargas Gil, Silvina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Fitopatología y Fisiología Vegetal; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Meriles, José M. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal (IMBIV); Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Conforto, Erica Cinthia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Fitopatología y Fisiología Vegetal ; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Figoni, Gervasio Jose. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Fitopatología y Fisiología Vegetal; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Basanta, Maria. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Manfredi; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Lovera, Edgar Francisco. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Manfredi; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: March, Guillermo Juan. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Fitopatología y Fisiología Vegetal ; Argentinaes_AR
dc.subtypecientifico


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

common

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem