Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

resumen

Resumen
Most of the studies addressing the influence of management practices on seasonal crop water use efficiency (i.e., the ratio between shoot biomass and evapotranspiration in a seasonal scale, WUE(B, ET, s)) have focused on their effect on evaporation. Processes specifically related to the crop transpiration component received less attention as possible mechanisms underlying WUE(B, ET, s) responses. In this study, we provide empirical evidence in support to [ver mas...]
dc.contributor.authorHernandez, Mariano Daniel
dc.contributor.authorAlfonso, Cecilia
dc.contributor.authorEcharte, María Mercedes
dc.contributor.authorCerrudo, Aníbal Alejandro
dc.contributor.authorEcharte, Laura
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-13T11:52:09Z
dc.date.available2021-04-13T11:52:09Z
dc.date.issued2021-03-08
dc.identifier.issn0378-3774
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106816
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/9071
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378377421000810
dc.description.abstractMost of the studies addressing the influence of management practices on seasonal crop water use efficiency (i.e., the ratio between shoot biomass and evapotranspiration in a seasonal scale, WUE(B, ET, s)) have focused on their effect on evaporation. Processes specifically related to the crop transpiration component received less attention as possible mechanisms underlying WUE(B, ET, s) responses. In this study, we provide empirical evidence in support to theoretical predictions on how agronomic management practices such as N supply or plant density changes modify maize (Zea mays L.) transpiration efficiency for shoot biomass production (i.e., the ratio between shoot biomass and transpiration in a seasonal scale, WUE(B, T, s)); and determine the contribution of crop conductance (gc) and radiation use efficiency (RUEB) to the response of WUE(B, T, s) to these management practices. Maize crops were grown at Balcarce, Argentina during four seasons. Treatments included two rates of N (i.e., 120 kg N ha−1 or non-fertilized during Seasons 1 and 2) or three plant densities (4, 8 and 12 plants m−2 with no N limitations, during Seasons 3 and 4). Measurements comprised (i) soil water content, evaporation and intercepted photosynthetically active radiation (iPAR) during the whole crop season, and (ii) shoot dry matter at physiological maturity (PM). Crop evapotranspiration (ET) was calculated by means of a water balance and soil evaporation (E) was estimated with micro-lysimeters. Crop transpiration (T) was estimated as the difference between ET and E; RUEB and WUE(B, T, s) were estimated from the ratio between crop biomass at PM and seasonal iPAR or T, respectively; and gc was estimated as T/iPAR (mm MJ−1). Higher N supply and plant densities positively affected WUE(B, ET, s) of maize crops, by increasing WUE(B, T, s) (ca. 19% for N supply and 8–12% for plant density) in addition to decreasing soil water evaporation. Changes in WUE(B, T, s) due to N supply were accounted by RUEB changes while gc was the main trait contributing to WUE(B, T, s) response to plant density. Crop conductance significantly decreased with maximum LAI increments up to 3.9. This work highlights the importance of considering crop conductance changes in response to management practices such as changing plant density.es_AR
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_AR
dc.language.isoenges_AR
dc.publisherElsevieres_AR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesses_AR
dc.sourceAgricultural Water Management 250 : 106816 (2021)es_AR
dc.subjectMaízes_AR
dc.subjectMaizeeng
dc.subjectTranspiraciónes_AR
dc.subjectTranspirationeng
dc.subjectEvaporaciónes_AR
dc.subjectEvaporationeng
dc.subjectRadiaciónes_AR
dc.subjectRadiationeng
dc.subjectBiomasaes_AR
dc.subjectBiomasseng
dc.subjectEficacia en el Uso del Aguaes_AR
dc.subjectWater Use Efficiencyeng
dc.titleMaize transpiration efficiency increases with N supply or higher plant densitieses_AR
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículoes_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_AR
dc.description.origenEEA Balcarcees_AR
dc.description.filFil: Hernández, Mariano D. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: Alfonso, Cecilia. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: Echarte, María Mercedes. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto de Innovación para la Producción Agropecuaria y el Desarrollo Sostenible; Argentina.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: Echarte, María Mercedes. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: Cerrudo, Aníbal Alejandro. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto de Innovación para la Producción Agropecuaria y el Desarrollo Sostenible; Argentina.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: Cerrudo, Aníbal Alejandro. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: Echarte, Laura. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto de Innovación para la Producción Agropecuaria y el Desarrollo Sostenible; Argentina.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: Echarte, Laura. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina.es_AR
dc.subtypecientifico


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

common

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem