Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

resumen

Resumen
The objectives of this study were i) to measure the soil N2O fluxes in a cropping system currently adopted by farmers of the region (FP), and in an ecologically intensified cropping system (EI) over two consecutive maize growing seasons (2011–12 and 2012–13), and ii) to relate N2O fluxes to soil factors. Gas fluxes were measured using vented static chambers, from October through April in each season. Fluxes of N2O ranged from 3 to 88 μg N2O-N m−2 h−1 in [ver mas...]
dc.contributor.authorPicone, Liliana
dc.contributor.authorBayer, Cimélio
dc.contributor.authorVidela, Cecilia
dc.contributor.authorRizzalli, Roberto Héctor
dc.contributor.authorCasanave Ponti, Sheila Mailén
dc.contributor.authorAndrade, Fernando Hector
dc.contributor.authorGarcia, Fernando
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-04T14:53:32Z
dc.date.available2021-03-04T14:53:32Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-14
dc.identifier.issn2352-0094
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.geodrs.2021.e00362
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/8816
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352009421000079
dc.description.abstractThe objectives of this study were i) to measure the soil N2O fluxes in a cropping system currently adopted by farmers of the region (FP), and in an ecologically intensified cropping system (EI) over two consecutive maize growing seasons (2011–12 and 2012–13), and ii) to relate N2O fluxes to soil factors. Gas fluxes were measured using vented static chambers, from October through April in each season. Fluxes of N2O ranged from 3 to 88 μg N2O-N m−2 h−1 in 2011–12, and between 3 and 97 μg N2O-N m−2 h−1 in 2012–13. There was a significant (p < 0.05) interaction in N2O fluxes between management systems and sampling dates (p < 0.05) in both seasons. The highest N2O fluxes were observed often following a precipitation event and shortly after N fertilization. While management system impacted on maize grain yield, it had no significant (p > 0.05) effect on cumulative N2O emissions, which were, on average across two seasons, 558 g N2O-N ha−1 for the EI treatment and 578 g N2O-N ha−1 for the FP treatment. Cumulative N2O emissions tended to be 20% greater over 153 days in 2012–13 compared with over 156 days in 2011–12 mainly due to differences in total and timing precipitations. As there were no differences in cumulative N2O emissions between managements but grain yield was higher under EI, this treatment had lower yield-based N2O emissions (75 g N2O-N Mg−1 grain) compared with FP treatment (94 g N2O-N Mg−1 grain). The results showed that a moderate increase in N rate (10 kg N ha−1), combined with N split-application and UAN (urea-ammonium nitrate) as N source, as well as other crop management practices, can be a viable alternative to improve maize productivity without increasing the N2O environmental impact.eng
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_AR
dc.language.isoenges_AR
dc.publisherElsevieres_AR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_AR
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.sourceGeoderma Regional 24 : e00362 (2021)es_AR
dc.subjectMaízes_AR
dc.subjectMaizeeng
dc.subjectÓxido Nitrosoes_AR
dc.subjectNitrous Oxideeng
dc.subjectEmisiones de Gases de Efecto Invernaderoes_AR
dc.subjectGreenhouse Gases Emissionseng
dc.subjectIntensificaciónes_AR
dc.subjectIntensificationeng
dc.subjectMolisoleses_AR
dc.subjectMollisolseng
dc.subjectManejo del Sueloes_AR
dc.subjectSoil Managementeng
dc.subjectArgentinaes_AR
dc.titleNitrous oxide emissions in maize on mollisols in the Pampas of Argentinaes_AR
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículoes_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_AR
dc.rights.licenseCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
dc.description.origenEEA Balcarcees_AR
dc.description.filFil: Picone, Liliana. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina
dc.description.filFil: Bayer, Cimélio. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Faculdade de Agronomia. Departamento de Solos; Brasil
dc.description.filFil: Videla, Cecilia. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina.
dc.description.filFil:. Rizzalli, Roberto Héctor. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina.
dc.description.filFil: Casanave Ponti, Sheila M. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina.
dc.description.filFil: Andrade, Fernando Héctor. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina.
dc.description.filFil: García, Fernando O. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina.
dc.subtypecientifico


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

common

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess