resumen
Abstract
We share the spirit of Plan S to achieve full open access to scholarly publications (see go.nature.com/2hszsaf), but we
disagree with its implementation
guidelines. The plan’s design ignores more than 20 years of widespread experience in open-access publishing in many developing nations, as well as
Latin America’s widespread ethos of free-to-publish and free-toread research.
To rectify this, the Plan S guidelines need to tackle the longstanding issues
[ver mas...]
dc.contributor.author | Debat, Humberto Julio | |
dc.contributor.author | Babini, Dominique | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-12-04T18:26:55Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-12-04T18:26:55Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-09-24 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0028-0836 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1476-4687 (online) | |
dc.identifier.other | https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02857-1 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/8374 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-02857-1 | |
dc.description.abstract | We share the spirit of Plan S to achieve full open access to scholarly publications (see go.nature.com/2hszsaf), but we disagree with its implementation guidelines. The plan’s design ignores more than 20 years of widespread experience in open-access publishing in many developing nations, as well as Latin America’s widespread ethos of free-to-publish and free-toread research. To rectify this, the Plan S guidelines need to tackle the longstanding issues of conventional scholarly publishing, including the high concentration of articles in commercial publications. Funders should promote open-access practices that are more globally inclusive, while improving the quality of editorial processes and keeping their control within the scientific community. | eng |
dc.format | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | eng | es_AR |
dc.publisher | Nature Research | es_AR |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es_AR |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ | |
dc.source | Nature 573 (7720) : 495 (September 2019) | es_AR |
dc.subject | Acceso a la Información | |
dc.subject | Access to Information | eng |
dc.subject | Acceso Abierto | |
dc.subject | Open Access | eng |
dc.subject | Publicaciones | |
dc.subject | Publications | eng |
dc.subject | América Latina | |
dc.subject | Latin America | eng |
dc.subject.other | Plan S | es_AR |
dc.subject.other | Open Access Publishing | es_AR |
dc.title | Plan S: take Latin America’s long experience on board | es_AR |
dc.type | info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo | es_AR |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_AR |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | es_AR |
dc.rights.license | Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) | |
dc.description.origen | Instituto de Patología Vegetal | es_AR |
dc.description.fil | Fil: Debat, Humberto Julio. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Patología Vegetal; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas Unidad de Fitopatología y Modelización Agrícola (UFYMA); Argentina | es_AR |
dc.description.fil | Fil: Babini, Dominique. Consejo Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales (CLACSO). Argentina | es_AR |
dc.subtype | cientifico |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
common
-
Artículos científicos [216]