Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

resumen

Resumen
It has been demonstrated that soybean (Glycine max) produces lower yields at relay intercropping with wheat (Triticum aestivum) than if it is sown as a sole crop. However, most studies considered wider or irregular soybean row spacing, compromising its capacity to recover after wheat harvest. This work studied the stress effects in relay soybean intercropping and suggests narrowing row spacing to improve soybean performance. The aims were (i) to compare [ver mas...]
dc.contributor.authorRoss, Fernando
dc.contributor.authorAbbate, Pablo Eduardo
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-13T12:59:28Z
dc.date.available2020-03-13T12:59:28Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn2349-0837
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.24297/jaa.v9i0.7906
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/6939
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.rajpub.com/index.php/jaa/article/view/7906
dc.description.abstractIt has been demonstrated that soybean (Glycine max) produces lower yields at relay intercropping with wheat (Triticum aestivum) than if it is sown as a sole crop. However, most studies considered wider or irregular soybean row spacing, compromising its capacity to recover after wheat harvest. This work studied the stress effects in relay soybean intercropping and suggests narrowing row spacing to improve soybean performance. The aims were (i) to compare growth and yield of two planting patterns and (ii) to separate the effect of water stress (WS) from the effects of other stress factors (OSF) induced by wheat on intercropping soybean. WS was evaluated comparing above-ground dry and grain yield of irrigated and non irrigated intercropping soybean, and OSF was evaluated comparing intercropping soybean with another treatment in which wheat straw (aerial biomass) was eliminated at soybean emergence, both irrigated treatments. In wheat, similar yields were obtained in treatments with an intercropping planting pattern with two rows for wheat and one for soybean (2:1) compared to three rows for wheat and one row for soybean (3:1). However, intercropping soybean at narrow row spacing (52 cm; 2:1) improve yielded 23% more than intercropping at 70 cm (3:1). During wheat-soybean coexistence, OSF prevailed on soybean and this effect persisted in later stages. After wheat harvest, OSF reduced the amount of light interception from R1 to R5 and depressed the crop growth rate (CGR) in 34%. However, in this period, WS also affected the radiation use efficiencies (RUE) which explained the greater fraction (66%) of the total stress induced by wheat in soybean CGR. Intercrop soybean yielded 182 g m-2 less compared to the unstressed sole crop control. Considering the wheat effects on soybean growth, 63% (116.5 g m-2) of the total yield lost were due to WS. Therefore, most of the performance of relay intercropping soybean was linked with water disponibility since early stages. However, at optimum water condition wheat competition by light and resources also affected soybean yield (OSF: 37%).eng
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_AR
dc.language.isoenges_AR
dc.publisherKhalsa Publications, Indiaes_AR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_AR
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.sourceJournal of Advances In Agriculture 9 : 1498-1510. (2018)es_AR
dc.subjectSojaes_AR
dc.subjectSoybeanseng
dc.subjectCrecimientoes_AR
dc.subjectGrowtheng
dc.subjectCultivo Intercaladoes_AR
dc.subjectIntercroppingeng
dc.subjectTrigoes_AR
dc.subjectWheateng
dc.subjectRendimientoes_AR
dc.subjectYieldseng
dc.subjectcientifico
dc.titleEffects on soybean growth and yield of wheat-soybean intercropping systemes_AR
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículoes_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_AR
dc.rights.licenseCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
dc.description.origenEEA Barrowes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Ross, Fernando. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Barrow; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Abbate, Pablo Eduardo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce. Unidad Integrada. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentinaes_AR


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

common

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess