Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
resumen
Resumen
The growth of a stand is the sum of the growth of individual trees. Growth of individual trees can be explained by the amount of resources captured and how efficiently those resources are used (production ecology). The relationship between the contribution of a tree to stand growth relative to the contribution to stand biomass is expressed by the growth dominance. Patterns of growth dominance vary among tree species and stand age, suggesting that
[ver mas...]
dc.contributor.author | Fernandez Tschieder, Ezequiel | |
dc.contributor.author | Binkley, Dan | |
dc.contributor.author | Bauerle, William | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-02-17T14:21:27Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-02-17T14:21:27Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-01 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0378-1127 | |
dc.identifier.other | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.117891 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/6779 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378112719323205 | |
dc.description.abstract | The growth of a stand is the sum of the growth of individual trees. Growth of individual trees can be explained by the amount of resources captured and how efficiently those resources are used (production ecology). The relationship between the contribution of a tree to stand growth relative to the contribution to stand biomass is expressed by the growth dominance. Patterns of growth dominance vary among tree species and stand age, suggesting that differences in production ecology underlie the observed patterns of growth dominance within stands. We explored the production ecology in an old-growth ponderosa pine forest. Growth dominance was strongly negative (−0.22) and was the outcome of a less-than-proportional increase of tree growth as a function of tree size. Dominant trees were almost 5 times larger than suppressed trees (1024 vs. 211 kg tree−1) but grew only about 2 times more than suppressed trees (4.3 vs. 1.9 kg tree−1 year−1). Dominant trees captured a lessthan-proportional amount of light relative to their size (90.4 vs. 20.9 GJ year−1 tree−1) and light use efficiency declined with tree size. Suppressed trees were twice as efficient as dominant trees (0.11 vs. 0.05 kg[wood] GJ [PAR]−1). Our results highlight the link between growth dominance, competition for resources, and the pattern of light use efficiency among large versus small trees. | eng |
dc.format | application/pdf | es_AR |
dc.language.iso | eng | es_AR |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | es_AR |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess | es_AR |
dc.source | Forest Ecology and Management 460 : 117891 (2020) | es_AR |
dc.subject | Bosques | es_AR |
dc.subject | Forests | eng |
dc.subject | Pinus | es_AR |
dc.subject | Pinares | es_AR |
dc.subject | Pine Forests | eng |
dc.subject | Pinus Ponderosa | es_AR |
dc.subject | Crecimiento | es_AR |
dc.subject | Growth | eng |
dc.subject | Ecología | es_AR |
dc.subject | Ecology | eng |
dc.title | Production ecology and reverse growth dominance in an old-growth ponderosa pine forest | es_AR |
dc.type | info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo | es_AR |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_AR |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | es_AR |
dc.description.origen | EEA Delta del Paraná | es_AR |
dc.description.fil | Fil: Fernandez Tschieder, Ezequiel. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Delta del Paraná; Argentina. Colorado State University. Department of Ecosystem Science and Sustainability. Graduate Degree Program in Ecology; Estados Unidos | es_AR |
dc.description.fil | Fil: Binkley, Dan. Northern Arizona University. School of Forestry; Estados Unidos | es_AR |
dc.description.fil | Fil: Bauerle, William. Colorado State University. Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture; Estados Unidos | es_AR |
dc.subtype | cientifico |
Ficheros en el ítem
Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)
common