Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

resumen

Resumen
Mutualistic interaction networks have been shown to be structurally conserved over space and time while pairwise interactions show high variability. In such networks, modularity is the division of species into compartments, or modules, where species within modules share more interactions with each other than they do with species from other modules. Such a modular structure is common in mutualistic networks and several evolutionary and ecological [ver mas...]
dc.contributor.authorCarstensen, Daniel W.
dc.contributor.authorSabatino, Cristina Malena
dc.contributor.authorMorellato, Leonor Patricia C.
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-25T14:43:27Z
dc.date.available2019-03-25T14:43:27Z
dc.date.issued2016-05
dc.identifier.issn0012-9658
dc.identifier.issn1939-9170
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1890/15-0830.1
dc.identifier.urihttps://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1890/15-0830.1
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/4723
dc.description.abstractMutualistic interaction networks have been shown to be structurally conserved over space and time while pairwise interactions show high variability. In such networks, modularity is the division of species into compartments, or modules, where species within modules share more interactions with each other than they do with species from other modules. Such a modular structure is common in mutualistic networks and several evolutionary and ecological mechanisms have been proposed as underlying drivers. One prominent explanation is the existence of pollination syndromes where flowers tend to attract certain pollinators as determined by a set of traits. We investigate the modularity of seven community level plant‐pollinator networks sampled in rupestrian grasslands, or campos rupestres, in SE Brazil. Defining pollination systems as corresponding groups of flower syndromes and pollinator functional groups, we test the two hypotheses that (1) interacting species from the same pollination system are more often assigned to the same module than interacting species from different pollination systems and; that (2) interactions between species from the same pollination system are more consistent across space than interactions between species from different pollination systems. Specifically we ask (1) whether networks are consistently modular across space; (2) whether interactions among species of the same pollination system occur more often inside modules, compared to interactions among species of different pollination systems, and finally; (3) whether the spatial variation in interaction identity, i.e., spatial interaction rewiring, is affected by trait complementarity among species as indicated by pollination systems. We confirm that networks are consistently modular across space and that interactions within pollination systems principally occur inside modules. Despite a strong tendency, we did not find a significant effect of pollination systems on the spatial consistency of pairwise interactions. These results indicate that the spatial rewiring of interactions could be constrained by pollination systems, resulting in conserved network structures in spite of high variation in pairwise interactions. Our findings suggest a relevant role of pollination systems in structuring plant‐pollinator networks and we argue that structural patterns at the sub‐network level can help us to fully understand how and why interactions vary across space and time.eng
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_AR
dc.language.isoenges_AR
dc.publisherWileyes_AR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesses_AR
dc.sourceEcology 97 (5) : 1298-1306 (May 2016)es_AR
dc.subjectPolinizaciónes_AR
dc.subjectPollinationeng
dc.subjectPraderases_AR
dc.subjectGrasslandseng
dc.subject.otherCampos Rupestreses_AR
dc.titleModularity, pollination systems, and interaction turnover in plant‐pollinator networks across spacees_AR
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículoes_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_AR
dc.description.origenEEA Balcarcees_AR
dc.description.filFil: Carstensen, Daniel W.. Universidade Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho. Instituto de Biociências; Brasil. Universidad de Copenhagen. Natural History Museum of Denmark. Center for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate; Dinamarcaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Sabatino, Malena. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: Morellato, Leonor Patricia C. Universidade Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho. Instituto de Biociências; Brasil.es_AR
dc.subtypecientifico


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

common

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem