Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

resumen

Resumen
The potential of landscapes to supply multiple benefits to society beyond commodities production has received increasing research and policy attention. Linking the concept of multifunctionality with the ecosystem services (ES) approach offers a promising avenue for producing scientific evidence to inform landscape planning, e.g., about the relative utility of land-sharing and land-sparing. However, the value for decision-making of ES-based [ver mas...]
dc.contributor.authorMastrangelo, Matías Enrique
dc.contributor.authorWeyland, Federico
dc.contributor.authorVillarino, Sebastian Horacio
dc.contributor.authorBarral, Maria Paula
dc.contributor.authorNahuelhual, Laura
dc.contributor.authorLaterra, Pedro
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-07T15:11:24Z
dc.date.available2018-12-07T15:11:24Z
dc.date.issued2014-02
dc.identifier.issn0921-2973
dc.identifier.issn1572-9761
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-013-9959-9
dc.identifier.urihttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10980-013-9959-9
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/4028
dc.description.abstractThe potential of landscapes to supply multiple benefits to society beyond commodities production has received increasing research and policy attention. Linking the concept of multifunctionality with the ecosystem services (ES) approach offers a promising avenue for producing scientific evidence to inform landscape planning, e.g., about the relative utility of land-sharing and land-sparing. However, the value for decision-making of ES-based multifunctionality assessments has been constrained by a significant conceptual and methodological dispersion. To contribute towards a cohesive framework for landscape multifunctionality, we analyse case studies of joint ES supply regarding ten criteria designed to ultimately answer four aspects: (i) the multifunctionality of what (e.g., landscapes), (ii) the type of multifunctionality (e.g., based on ES synergies), (iii) the procedure of multifunctionality assessments, and (iv) the purpose of multifunctionality. We constructed a typology of methodological approaches based on scores for criteria describing the evaluation method and the level of stakeholder participation in assessments of joint ES supply. Surveyed studies and underlying types of methodological approaches (spatial, socio-spatial, functional, spatio-functional) differed in most criteria. We illustrate the influence of methodological divergence on planning recommendations by comparing two studies employing contrasting approaches (spatial and functional) to assess the joint supply of wildlife habitat and agricultural production in the Argentine Chaco. We distinguish between a pattern-based and process-based multifunctionality, where the latter can only be detected through approaches considering the ecological processes (e.g., ES complementarities) supporting the supply of multiple ES (functional and spatio-functional). Finally, we propose an integrated approach for assessing a socially-relevant process-based multifunctionality.eng
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_AR
dc.language.isoenges_AR
dc.publisherSpringeres_AR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesses_AR
dc.sourceLandscape Ecology 29 (2) : 345–358 (February 2014)es_AR
dc.subjectPaisajees_AR
dc.subjectLandscapeeng
dc.subjectEcosistemaes_AR
dc.subjectEcosystemseng
dc.subjectAgentes Interesadoses_AR
dc.subjectStakeholderseng
dc.subjectEvaluaciónes_AR
dc.subjectAssessmenteng
dc.subject.otherServicios Ecosistémicoses_AR
dc.titleConcepts and methods for landscape multifunctionality and a unifying framework based on ecosystem serviceses_AR
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículoes_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_AR
dc.description.origenEEA Balcarcees_AR
dc.description.filFil: Mastrangelo, Matias Enrique. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Weyland, Federico. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Villarino, Sebastian Horacio. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Barral, Maria Paula. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Nahuelhual, Laura. Universidad Austral de Chile. Instituto de Economía Agraria; Chile. Fundación Centro de los Bosques Nativos; Chile. Center for Climate and Resilience Research; Chilees_AR
dc.description.filFil: Laterra, Pedro. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentinaes_AR
dc.subtypecientifico


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

common

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem