Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

resumen

Resumen
Background: This was a panel study of the prevalence of C. burnetii infection in does in an endemic dairy goat enterprise in Victoria, Australia. Our first objective was to determine the prevalence of does shedding C. burnetii at the time of parturition and to quantify the concentration of genome equivalents (GE) present in each C. burnetii positive sample. Our second objective was to determine the proportion of positive does that were persistent [ver mas...]
dc.contributor.authorCanevari, Jose Tobias
dc.contributor.authorFirestone, Simon M.
dc.contributor.authorVincent, Gemma
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, Angus
dc.contributor.authorTan, Tabita
dc.contributor.authorMuleme, Michael
dc.contributor.authorCameron, Alexander W. N.
dc.contributor.authorStevenson, Mark A.
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-29T12:45:37Z
dc.date.available2018-11-29T12:45:37Z
dc.date.issued2018-11
dc.identifier.issn1746-6148
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-018-1667-x
dc.identifier.urihttps://bmcvetres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12917-018-1667-x
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/3990
dc.description.abstractBackground: This was a panel study of the prevalence of C. burnetii infection in does in an endemic dairy goat enterprise in Victoria, Australia. Our first objective was to determine the prevalence of does shedding C. burnetii at the time of parturition and to quantify the concentration of genome equivalents (GE) present in each C. burnetii positive sample. Our second objective was to determine the proportion of positive does that were persistent shedders. Our final objective was to quantify the association between C. burnetii qPCR status at the time of kidding and daily milk volumes produced during the subsequent lactation. Results: Vaginal swabs (n= 490) were collected from does at the time of kidding and analysed using a quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assay. Shedding of C. burnetii was detected in 15% (95% CI: 12% to 18%) of the sampled does. Does were classified as qPCR-negative, qPCR-positive low and qPCR-positive high based on the estimated concentration of GE from the qPCR. Persistent shedding at relatively low concentrations was detected in 20% (95% CI: 10% to35%) of shedding does sampled again at their subsequent parturition. After controlling for possible confounders and adjusting for variation in daily milk yields at the individual doe level, daily milk yields for qPCR-positive high does were reduced by 17% (95% CI: 3% to 32%) compared to qPCR-negative does (p= 0.02). Conclusions: Shedding concentrations of C. burnetii were highly skewed, with a relatively small group of does shedding relatively high quantities of C. burnetii. Further, high shedding does had reduced milk yields compared to qPCR-negative does. Early detection and culling of high shedding does would result in increased farm profitability and reduce the risk of Q fever transmission.eng
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_AR
dc.language.isoenges_AR
dc.publisherSpringer Naturees_AR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_AR
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.sourceBMC Veterinary Research 14 : 353 (2018)es_AR
dc.subjectCoxiella burnetiies_AR
dc.subjectCaprinoses_AR
dc.subjectGoatseng
dc.subjectLeche de Cabraes_AR
dc.subjectGoat Milkeng
dc.subjectPérdidases_AR
dc.subjectLosseseng
dc.subjectEnfermedades de los Animaleses_AR
dc.subjectAnimal Diseaseseng
dc.subject.otherAustraliaes_AR
dc.titleThe prevalence of Coxiella burnetii shedding in dairy goats at the time of parturition in an endemically infected enterprise and associated milk yield losseses_AR
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículoes_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_AR
dc.rights.licenseCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
dc.description.origenInstituto de Investigación Animal del Chaco Semiáridoes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Canevari, Jose Tobias. University of Melbourne. Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences. Asia-Pacific Centre for Animal Health; Australia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Investigación Animal del Chaco Semiárido; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Firestone, Simon M. University of Melbourne. Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences. Asia-Pacific Centre for Animal Health; Australia.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: Vincent, Gemma. Australian Rickettsial Reference Laboratory; Australiaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Campbell, Angus. University of Melbourne. Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences. Asia-Pacific Centre for Animal Health; Australia.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: Tan, Tabita. University of Melbourne. Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences. Asia-Pacific Centre for Animal Health; Australia.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: Muleme, Michael. University of Melbourne. Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences. Asia-Pacific Centre for Animal Health; Australia.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: Cameron, Alexander W. N. Meredith Dairy; Australiaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Stevenson, Mark A. University of Melbourne. Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences. Asia-Pacific Centre for Animal Health; Australia.es_AR
dc.subtypecientifico


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

common

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess