Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Instagram
    • español
    • English
  • Contacto
  •  
    • español
    • English
  • Mi Cuenta
Acerca deAutoresTítulosTemasColeccionesComunidades☰
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
Ver ítem 
    xmlui.general.dspace_homeCentros e Institutos de InvestigaciónCIAP. Centro de Investigaciones AgropecuariasInstituto de Fisiología y Recursos Genéticos VegetalesArtículos científicosxmlui.ArtifactBrowser.ItemViewer.trail
  • Inicio
  • Centros e Institutos de Investigación
  • CIAP. Centro de Investigaciones Agropecuarias
  • Instituto de Fisiología y Recursos Genéticos Vegetales
  • Artículos científicos
  • Ver ítem

Response of determinate and indeterminate soybean cultivars to basal and topdressing N fertilization compared to sole inoculation with Bradyrhizobium

Resumen
Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) new cultivars have high N demands to sustain increasing grain yields. One may ask whether these cultivars would need basal and/or topdressing N application as perhaps symbiotic N2 fixation would not catch up with the increased N needs. In this study, three field experiments were performed in three different ecoregions of Brazil to compare soybean with determinate (BRS-294-RR and BRS-295-RR) and indeterminate (Vmax-RR, [ver mas...]
Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) new cultivars have high N demands to sustain increasing grain yields. One may ask whether these cultivars would need basal and/or topdressing N application as perhaps symbiotic N2 fixation would not catch up with the increased N needs. In this study, three field experiments were performed in three different ecoregions of Brazil to compare soybean with determinate (BRS-294-RR and BRS-295-RR) and indeterminate (Vmax-RR, BMX-Potência-RR and BRS 284) growth types. The experiments consisted of four treatments, all inoculated with efficient Bradyrhizobium strains, but with differences in N fertilizer (as urea) application: (T1) control without N fertilizer; (T2) basal application of 30 kg N ha−1 at sowing; (T3) topdressing of 50 kg N ha−1 at full flowering; (T4) 30 kg N ha−1 and 50 kg N ha−1 as basal and topdressing, respectively. None of the basal or topdressing treatments improved biomass production or grain yield. However, N fertilizer negatively affected nodule number and dry weight, pointing out a down-regulation in the symbiotic performance, without improving crop yields. Similar results were observed in cultivars of both growth types, indicating that biological nitrogen fixation can supply N needs of new soybean genotypes of both growth types. [Cerrar]
Thumbnail
Autor
Kaschuka, Glaciela;   Nogueira, Marco Antonio;   De Luca, Marcos Javier;   Hungria, Mariangela;  
Fuente
Field crops research 195 : 21-27. (15 August 2016)
Fecha
2016-08
Editorial
Elsevier
ISSN
0378-4290
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/3681
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378429016301630?via%3Dihub
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2016.05.010
Formato
pdf
Tipo de documento
artículo
Palabras Claves
Soja; Soybeans; Glycine Max; Abonos Nitrogenados; Nitrogen Fertilizers; Bradyrhizobium; Variedades; Varieties; Nitrogen Fixation; Fijación del Nitrógeno; Symbiosis; Simbiosis; Nitrogen Metabolism; Metabolismo del Nitrógeno; Brasil; Fertilización Nitrogenada;
Derechos de acceso
Restringido
Descargar
Compartir
  • Compartir
    Facebook Email Twitter Mendeley
Excepto donde se diga explicitamente, este item se publica bajo la siguiente descripción: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Unported (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5)
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítem