Show simple item record

resumen

Abstract
Target spot of soybean has spread in Brazil, the southeastern United States and Argentina in the last decade. A collaborative network of field Uniform Fungicide Trials (UFT) in Brazil was created in 2011 to study the target spot control efficacy of fungicides, including azoxystrobin + benzovindiflupyr (AZ_BF), carbendazim (CZM), fluxapyroxad + pyraclostrobin (FLUX_PYRA), epoxiconazole + FLUX_PYRA (EPO_FLUX_PYRA), mancozeb (MZB) and prothioconazole + [ver mas...]
dc.contributor.authorEdwards Molina, Juan Pablo
dc.contributor.authorPaul, Pierce A.
dc.contributor.authorAmorim, Lilian
dc.contributor.authorda Silva, Luis Henrique Carregal Pereira
dc.contributor.authorSiqueri, Fabiano Victor
dc.contributor.authorBorges, Edson Pereira
dc.contributor.authorCampos, H.D.
dc.contributor.authorNunes Júnior, José
dc.contributor.authorMeyer, Maurício Conrado
dc.contributor.authorMartins, Mônica Cagnin
dc.contributor.authorBalardin, Ricardo Silveiro
dc.contributor.authorCarlin, Valtemir José
dc.contributor.authorGrigolli, José Fernando
dc.contributor.authorBelufi, Luana Maria de Rossi
dc.contributor.authorGodoy, Claudia Vieira
dc.dateinfo:eu-repo/date/embargoedEnd/2019-08-14
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-19T12:42:16Z
dc.date.available2018-10-19T12:42:16Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn1365-3059
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.12925
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/3642
dc.identifier.urihttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/ppa.12925
dc.description.abstractTarget spot of soybean has spread in Brazil, the southeastern United States and Argentina in the last decade. A collaborative network of field Uniform Fungicide Trials (UFT) in Brazil was created in 2011 to study the target spot control efficacy of fungicides, including azoxystrobin + benzovindiflupyr (AZ_BF), carbendazim (CZM), fluxapyroxad + pyraclostrobin (FLUX_PYRA), epoxiconazole + FLUX_PYRA (EPO_FLUX_PYRA), mancozeb (MZB) and prothioconazole + trifloxystrobin (PROT_TRIF). Network meta‐analysis was used to conduct a quantitative synthesis of UFT data collected from 2012 to 2016 and to evaluate the effects of disease pressure (DP, low ≤ 35% target spot severity in the nontreated control < high) and year of experiment on the overall mean efficacy and yield response to each of the tested fungicides. Based on mean percentage control of target spot severity, the tested fungicides fall into three efficacy groups (EG): high EG, FLUX_PYRA (76.2% control relative to the nontreated control) and EPO_FLUX_PYRA (75.7% control); intermediate EG, PROT_TRIF (66.5% control) and low EG, MZB (49.6% control), AZ_BF (46.7% control) and CZM (32.4% control). DP had a significant effect on yield response. At DPLow, the highest response was due to PROT_TRIF (+342 kg ha−1, +12.8%) and EPO_FLUX_PYRA (+295.5 kg ha−1, +11.2%), whereas at DPHigh, EPO_FLUX_PYRA and FLUX_PYRA outperformed the other treatments, with yield responses of 503 kg ha−1 (+20.2%) and 469 kg ha−1 (+19.1%), respectively. The probability of a positive return on fungicide investment ranged from 0.26 to 0.56 at DPLow and from 0.34 to 0.66 at DPHigh.es_AR
dc.formatapplication/pdfeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWileyeng
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccesseng
dc.sourcePlant pathology. (04 August 2018)eng
dc.subjectSojaes_AR
dc.subjectGlycine Maxes_AR
dc.subjectSoybeanseng
dc.subjectRendimientoes_AR
dc.subjectYieldseng
dc.subjectCorynespora Cassiicolaes_AR
dc.subjectProfitabilityeng
dc.subjectRentabilidades_AR
dc.subjectFungicidases_AR
dc.subjectFungicideseng
dc.subject.otherNetwork Meta-analysiseng
dc.titleMeta‐analysis of fungicide efficacy on soybean target spot and cost–benefit assessmenteng
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículoes_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleeng
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersioneng
dc.description.origenInstituto de Patología Vegetales_AR
dc.description.filFil: Edwards Molina, Juan Pablo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Patología Vegetal; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Paul, Pierce A. Ohio State University. Department of Plant Pathology. Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center; Estados Unidoses_AR
dc.description.filFil: Amorim, Lilian. Universidade de São Paulo. Departamento de Fitopatologia e Nematologia; Brasiles_AR
dc.description.filFil: da Silva, Luis Henrique Carregal Pereira. Agro Carregal, Rio Verde; Brasiles_AR
dc.description.filFil: Siqueri, Fabiano Victor. Fundação Mato Grosso; Brasiles_AR
dc.description.filFil: Borges, Edson Pereira. Fundação Chapadão; Brasiles_AR
dc.description.filFil: Campos, H.D. Universidade de Rio Verde; Brasiles_AR
dc.description.filFil: Nunes Júnior, José. Centro Tecnológico para Pesquisas Agropecuárias, Goiânia; Brasiles_AR
dc.description.filFil: Meyer, Maurício Conrado. Embrapa Soja; Brasiles_AR
dc.description.filFil: Martins, Mônica Cagnin. Círculo Verde Assessoria Agronômica e Pesquisa, Luís Eduardo Magalhães; Brasiles_AR
dc.description.filFil: Balardin, Ricardo Silveiro. Universidade Federal de Santa Maria; Brasiles_AR
dc.description.filFil: Carlin, Valtemir José. Agrodinâmica, Tangará da Serra; Brasiles_AR
dc.description.filFil: Grigolli, José Fernando. Fundação MS, Maracajú; Brasiles_AR
dc.description.filFil: Belufi, Luana Maria de Rossi. Fundação Rio Verde, Lucas do Rio Verde; Brasiles_AR
dc.description.filFil: Godoy, Claudia Vieira. Embrapa Soja; Brasiles_AR
dc.subtypecientifico


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

common

Show simple item record