Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

resumen

Resumen
Introduction: The ecosystem services provided by soil microbial communities are critical for the resilience of agroecosystems, ensuring environmental conservation and food security. Long-term experiments comparing contrasting crop rotations are valuable tools for monitoring microbial responses, but they rarely include all crop phases within a single year. Therefore, the long-term agronomic impact may be masked by the immediate effect of the crop [ver mas...]
dc.contributor.authorFrene, Juan Pablo
dc.contributor.authorBacigaluppo, Silvina
dc.contributor.authorMaury, Mariana
dc.contributor.authorOrtiz, Jimena
dc.contributor.authorRivarola, Maximo Lisandro
dc.contributor.authorSalvagiotti, Fernando
dc.contributor.authorFaggioli, Valeria Soledad
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-13T13:08:34Z
dc.date.available2025-06-13T13:08:34Z
dc.date.issued2024-12
dc.identifier.issn2673-3218
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.3389/fagro.2024.1446404
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/22681
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.frontiersin.org/journals/agronomy/articles/10.3389/fagro.2024.1446404/full
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The ecosystem services provided by soil microbial communities are critical for the resilience of agroecosystems, ensuring environmental conservation and food security. Long-term experiments comparing contrasting crop rotations are valuable tools for monitoring microbial responses, but they rarely include all crop phases within a single year. Therefore, the long-term agronomic impact may be masked by the immediate effect of the crop evaluated. In this study, we compared different crop rotations based on the Intensification Sequence Index (ISI), which considers the soil occupation time, and analyzed the impact of cover crops and two nitrogen fertilization strategies. Material and methods: We used an experiment initiated in 2006 with the following crop rotations: Soybean-Soybean, Maize-Wheat/Soybean, and Maize-Soybean-Wheat/Soybean. Soil samples were taken after the harvest of each summer crop phase (i.e., Soybean, Maize, Wheat/Soybean), and the soil prokaryotic community was monitored using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Results and discussion: We observed that ISI and crop phase were the main predictors of microbial community composition, explaining 14.7% and 13.0% of the variation, respectively. Nitrogen fertilization had a minor effect (3.12%) and was detected only after maize sampling; cover crops had no significant effect. However, the presence of cover crops showed higher alpha diversity and an increased abundance of Proteobacteria. Maize enriched the abundance of certain taxa of Planctomycetes and Verrucomicrobia, while Soybean increased the abundance of Bacteroidetes and Proteobacteria. Comparatively, Soybean enriched Mucilaginibacter and Geobacter, while Wheat/Soybean enriched Brevundimonas and Roseimicrobium. Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that crop phase is as important as the long-term legacy of crop rotations in shaping the microbial community and that specific taxa responses are highly dependent on the crop phase surveyed.spa
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_AR
dc.language.isoenges_AR
dc.publisherFrontiers Mediaes_AR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_AR
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/es_AR
dc.sourceFrontiers in Agronomy 6 : 1446404. (December 2024)es_AR
dc.subjectCultivoses_AR
dc.subjectCropseng
dc.subjectSueloes_AR
dc.subjectSoileng
dc.subjectAplicación de Abonoses_AR
dc.subjectFertilizer Applicationeng
dc.subjectAbonos Nitrogenadoses_AR
dc.subjectNitrogen Fertilizerseng
dc.subjectPlantas de Coberturaes_AR
dc.subjectCover Plantseng
dc.subjectIntensificaciónes_AR
dc.subjectIntensificationeng
dc.subject.otherFertilización Nitrogenadaes_AR
dc.subject.otherNitrogen Fertilizationeng
dc.subject.otherCultivos de Coberturaes_AR
dc.titleCrop-specific response of soil prokaryotic community to long-term intensification management: the importance of crop phase at samplinges_AR
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículoes_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_AR
dc.rights.licenseCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)es_AR
dc.description.origenEEA Marcos Juárezes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Frene, Juan Pablo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Marcos Juárez; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Bacigaluppo, Silvina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Oliveros; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Maury, Mariana. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Marcos Juárez; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Ortiz, Jimena. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Marcos Juárez; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Rivarola, Maximo Lisandro. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Agrobiotecnología y Biología Molecular; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Rivarola, Maximo Lisandro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Salvagiotti, Fernando. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Oliveros; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Faggioli, Valeria Soledad. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Marcos Juárez; Argentinaes_AR
dc.subtypecientifico


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

common

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess