Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

resumen

Resumen
Context or problem: A trade-off between seed protein concentration (SPC) and yield has been reported for soybean. Therefore, assessing management practices that can nullify this trade-off is relevant to avoid further declines in SPC in the future as yield continues to increase. While the positive effect of irrigation on yield is well documented, only a few studies have assessed the impact of irrigation on SPC, showing conflicting results. Objective or [ver mas...]
dc.contributor.authorCarciocchi, Walter Daniel
dc.contributor.authorGrassini, Patricio
dc.contributor.authorNaeve, Seth
dc.contributor.authorSpecht, James
dc.contributor.authorMamo, Mitiku
dc.contributor.authorSeymour, Ron
dc.contributor.authorNygren, Aaron
dc.contributor.authorMueller, Nathan
dc.contributor.authorSivits, Sarah
dc.contributor.authorProctor, Christopher
dc.contributor.authorRees, Jenny
dc.contributor.authorWhitney, Todd
dc.contributor.authorCafaro La Menza, Nicolás
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-24T13:06:18Z
dc.date.available2024-05-24T13:06:18Z
dc.date.issued2023-12-01
dc.identifier.issn0378-4290
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2023.109163
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/17885
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378429023003568
dc.description.abstractContext or problem: A trade-off between seed protein concentration (SPC) and yield has been reported for soybean. Therefore, assessing management practices that can nullify this trade-off is relevant to avoid further declines in SPC in the future as yield continues to increase. While the positive effect of irrigation on yield is well documented, only a few studies have assessed the impact of irrigation on SPC, showing conflicting results. Objective or research question: The objective was to determine if the trade-off between seed yield and SPC persists when irrigation is applied and how management, soil, and weather factors influence the trade-off. We hypothesized that yield increases induced by irrigation would likely decrease SPC. Methods: Our experimental approach involved the use of producer-reported data, in-situ seed collection, and crop modeling. Yield and management data were collected from 268 soybean fields in Nebraska (USA), along with data on SPC, seed oil concentration (SOC), and seed carbohydrate concentration (SCC) determined from samples collected in each field. Field-specific phenological data were derived from model simulations. The combined data were then used to assess the effect of irrigation on seed yield and constituents as influenced by management, soil, and weather factors. Results: On average, both seed yield (+0.86 Mg ha−1) and SPC (+3.2 g kg−1) were higher, but SOC (–2.0 g kg−1) was lower, and SCC was unaffected in irrigated versus rainfed field pairs. Yield and SPC increased simultaneously in response to irrigation in two-thirds of the fields, especially when environmental conditions did not favor seed oil synthesis (e.g., cooler temperature and less incident solar radiation). A trade-off of higher seed yield and lower SPC occurred with irrigation in the remaining fields wherein conditions were favorable for seed oil synthesis (e.g., warmer temperatures and greater radiation). Conclusions: Despite higher seed yield generated in irrigated versus rainfed fields, no concurrent reduction occurred in SPC in the majority of irrigated fields – a surprising finding that was not consistent with the general expectation that higher soybean yields typically result in yield-SPC trade-off. Implications or significance: This study showed that irrigation-induced higher soybean yields are possible without an attendant SPC penalty when temperatures and radiation are conducive for its mitigation. We are unaware of any other yield-increasing practices – except nitrogen (N) fertilization - that do not result in a concomitant decline in SPC. A hypothesized higher N supply via soil N mineralization and/or biological N fixation in irrigated fields in this study may explain the absence of yield-protein trade-off.eng
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_AR
dc.language.isoenges_AR
dc.publisherElsevieres_AR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_AR
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/es_AR
dc.sourceField Crops Research 304 : 109163 (December 2023)es_AR
dc.subjectGlycine Maxes_AR
dc.subjectSojaes_AR
dc.subjectSoybeanseng
dc.subjectProteínases_AR
dc.subjectProteinseng
dc.subjectAceite de Sojaes_AR
dc.subjectSoybean Oileng
dc.subjectDatos de Producciónes_AR
dc.subjectProduction Dataeng
dc.subjectRiegoes_AR
dc.subjectIrrigationeng
dc.titleIrrigation increases on-farm soybean yields in water-limited environments without a trade-off in seed protein concentrationes_AR
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículoes_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_AR
dc.rights.licenseCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)es_AR
dc.description.origenEEA Balcarcees_AR
dc.description.filFil: Carciochi, Walter Daniel. University of Nebraska. Department of Agronomy and Horticulture; Estados Unidoses_AR
dc.description.filFil: Carciochi, Walter Daniel. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce. Instituto de Innovación para la Producción Agropecuaria y el Desarrollo Sostenible; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Innovación para la Producción Agropecuaria y el Desarrollo Sostenible; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Carciochi, Walter Daniel. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Grassini, Patricio. University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Department of Agronomy and Horticulture; Estados Unidoses_AR
dc.description.filFil: Naeve, Seth. University of Minnesota. Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics; Estados Unidoses_AR
dc.description.filFil: Specht, James. University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Department of Agronomy and Horticulture; Estados Unidoses_AR
dc.description.filFil: Mamo, Mitiku. University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources; Estados Unidoses_AR
dc.description.filFil: Seymour, Ron. University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources; Estados Unidoses_AR
dc.description.filFil: Nygren, Aaron. University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources; Estados Unidoses_AR
dc.description.filFil: Mueller, Nathan. University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources; Estados Unidoses_AR
dc.description.filFil: Sivits, Sarah. University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources; Estados Unidoses_AR
dc.description.filFil: Proctor, Christopher. University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Department of Agronomy and Horticulture; Estados Unidoses_AR
dc.description.filFil: Rees, Jenny. University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources; Estados Unidoses_AR
dc.description.filFil: Whitney, Todd. University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources; Estados Unidoses_AR
dc.description.filFil: Cafaro La Menza, Nicolás. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce. Instituto de Innovación para la Producción Agropecuaria y el Desarrollo Sostenible; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Innovación para la Producción Agropecuaria y el Desarrollo Sostenible; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Cafaro La Menza, Nicolás. University of Nebraska. Department of Agronomy and Horticulture; Estados Unidoses_AR
dc.subtypecientifico


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

common

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess