Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

resumen

Resumen
Large trees in plantations generally produce more wood per unit of resource use than small trees. Two processes may account for this pattern: greater photosynthetic resource use efficiency or greater partitioning of carbon to wood production. We estimated gross primary production (GPP) at the individual scale by combining transpiration with photosynthetic water-use efficiency of Eucalyptus trees. Aboveground production fluxes were estimated using [ver mas...]
dc.contributor.authorFernandez Tschieder, Ezequiel
dc.contributor.authorMarshall, John D.
dc.contributor.authorBinkley, Dan
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-29T12:21:25Z
dc.date.available2024-04-29T12:21:25Z
dc.date.issued2024-04
dc.identifier.issn0028-646X
dc.identifier.issn1469-8137
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1111/nph.19764
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/17575
dc.identifier.urihttps://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nph.19764
dc.description.abstractLarge trees in plantations generally produce more wood per unit of resource use than small trees. Two processes may account for this pattern: greater photosynthetic resource use efficiency or greater partitioning of carbon to wood production. We estimated gross primary production (GPP) at the individual scale by combining transpiration with photosynthetic water-use efficiency of Eucalyptus trees. Aboveground production fluxes were estimated using allometric equations and modeled respiration; total belowground carbon fluxes (TBCF) were estimated by subtracting aboveground fluxes from GPP. Partitioning was estimated by dividing component fluxes by GPP. Dominant trees produced almost three times as much wood as suppressed trees. They used 25 ± 10% (mean ± SD) of their photosynthates for wood production, whereas suppressed trees only used 12 ± 2%. By contrast, dominant trees used 27 ± 19% of their photosynthate belowground, whereas suppressed trees used 58 ± 5%. Intermediate trees lay between these extremes. Photosynthetic water-use efficiency of dominant trees was c. 13% greater than the efficiency of suppressed trees. Suppressed trees used more than twice as much of their photosynthate belowground and less than half as much aboveground compared with dominant trees. Differences in carbon partitioning were much greater than differences in GPP or photosynthetic water-use efficiency.eng
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_AR
dc.language.isoenges_AR
dc.publisherWileyes_AR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesses_AR
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/es_AR
dc.sourceNew Phytologist : 1-12 (First published: 19 April 2024)es_AR
dc.subjectEucalyptuses_AR
dc.subjectCarbonoes_AR
dc.subjectCarboneng
dc.subjectEcologíaes_AR
dc.subjectEcologyeng
dc.subjectProducción de Maderaes_AR
dc.subjectWood Productioneng
dc.subjectEficacia en el Uso del Aguaes_AR
dc.subjectWater-use Efficiencyeng
dc.titleCarbon budget at the individual-tree scale: dominant Eucalyptus trees partition less carbon belowgroundes_AR
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículoes_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_AR
dc.rights.licenseCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)es_AR
dc.description.origenEEA Delta del Paranáes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Fernandez Tschieder, Ezequiel. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Delta del Paraná; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Fernandez Tschieder, Ezequiel. Colorado State University. Department of Ecosystem Science and Sustainability. Graduate Degree Program in Ecology; Estados Unidoses_AR
dc.description.filFil: Marshall, John D. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. Department of Forest Ecology and Management; Sueciaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Marshall, John D. Leibniz-Zentrum für Agrarlandschaftsforschung; Alemaniaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Marshall, John D. Gothenburg University. Department of Geological Sciences; Sueciaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Marshall, John D. Czech Globe. Department of Energy and Matter Fluxes; República Checaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Binkley, Dan. Northern Arizona University. School of Forestry; Estados Unidoses_AR
dc.subtypecientifico


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

common

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess