Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

resumen

Resumen
Effects of forest harvesting on biodiversity can be varied and complex to understand. We provide a meta-analysis of 553 studies plants, insects and birds to identify the general responses to Variable Retention harvesting (VR) 1–8 years post-harvest in Nothofagus pumilio forests of southern Patagonia. The analysis is focused on: (i) richness and abundance, (ii) origin and habitat (native forest specialist species, native species of other habitats, alien [ver mas...]
dc.contributor.authorSoler Esteban, Rosina Matilde
dc.contributor.authorSchindler, Stefan
dc.contributor.authorLencinas, María Vanessa
dc.contributor.authorPeri, Pablo Luis
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Pastur, Guillermo José
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-24T11:44:59Z
dc.date.available2018-09-24T11:44:59Z
dc.date.issued2016-06-01
dc.identifier.issn0378-1127
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.02.036
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112716300561
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/3450
dc.description.abstractEffects of forest harvesting on biodiversity can be varied and complex to understand. We provide a meta-analysis of 553 studies plants, insects and birds to identify the general responses to Variable Retention harvesting (VR) 1–8 years post-harvest in Nothofagus pumilio forests of southern Patagonia. The analysis is focused on: (i) richness and abundance, (ii) origin and habitat (native forest specialist species, native species of other habitats, alien species), and (iii) temporal trends after harvesting. Our objective was to evaluate why biodiversity increases after variable retention harvesting, by assessing the effects on (i) species richness and abundance in general, (ii) native forest specialists, native generalist species and alien species, and (iii) the recovery of biodiversity toward original conditions. Forests managed with VR supported higher overall richness and abundance of plants, insects and birds in aggregate and dispersed retention than unmanaged stands, but with similar values each other. However, origin and habitat of species affected responses to VR. Aggregates support higher native forest specialist plant and lower plants of habitats other than dispersed retention. However, both retention treatments increased alien plants, although its richness and abundance was higher in dispersed retention. Native forest specialist insects were reduced in comparison to unmanaged forest, while insects of other habitats showed a positive response to both aggregate and dispersed retention as well as did for bird species richness and abundance compared to unmanaged forests. We found evidence for recovery of original conditions for native forest specialist plants and insects, and plants of other habitats. In contrast, alien plants and native insects of other habitats increased continuously in the studies included through those representing 8 years post-harvest. Major differences among both retention patterns included significantly higher richness and abundance of alien plants and native insects of other habitats in dispersed retention. Our synthesis shows recovery toward original conditions for some taxa, but demonstrates long-term establishment of alien plants as well as insect species not associated with native N. pumilio forests. These have emerged as a main potential threat to conservation of forests under VR prescription, at least at the stand level. Retention forestry could play a fundamental role for conservation in productive temperate forests, but the influence of retention pattern and aggregate size are still unclear.eng
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_AR
dc.language.isoenges_AR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesses_AR
dc.sourceForest Ecology and Management 369 : 161-169 (June 2016)es_AR
dc.subjectBosqueses_AR
dc.subjectForestseng
dc.subjectBiodiversidades_AR
dc.subjectBiodiversityeng
dc.subjectNothofagus Pumilioes_AR
dc.subjectBosque Primarioes_AR
dc.subjectPrimary Forestseng
dc.subjectEcosistemaes_AR
dc.subjectEcosystemseng
dc.subject.otherRegión Patagónicaes_AR
dc.subject.otherBosques Nativoses_AR
dc.titleWhy biodiversity increases after variable retention harvesting: A meta-analysis for southern Patagonian forestses_AR
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículoes_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_AR
dc.description.origenEEA Santa Cruzes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Soler Esteban, Rosina Matilde. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Cientificas; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Schindler, Stefan. Universidad de Viena. Department of Conservation Biology, Vegetation & Landscape Ecology; Austria. Universidad de Porto. Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos; Portugal. Environment Agency Austria. Biodiversity & Nature Conservation; Austriaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Lencinas, María Vanessa. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Cientificas; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santa Cruz; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Cientificas; Argentinaes_AR
dc.subtypecientifico


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

common

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem