Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

resumen

Resumen
Straws of sex‐sorted sperm are usually packaged at a low concentration (e.g., ~2.1 × 106 sperm/ml) and cost significantly more than unsorted conventional semen from the same sire. In order to maximize the efficiency of using sex‐sorted sperm under in vitro fertilization conditions, the selection of an appropriate sperm separation technique is essential. In this study, the effect of using different silane‐coated silica colloid dilutions and layering [ver mas...]
dc.contributor.authorFerre, Luis Bernardo
dc.contributor.authorChitwood, James L.
dc.contributor.authorFresno, Cristóbal
dc.contributor.authorOrtega, Hugo Hector
dc.contributor.authorKjelland, Michael E.
dc.contributor.authorRoss, Pablo J.
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-25T17:39:23Z
dc.date.available2018-07-25T17:39:23Z
dc.date.issued2018-02
dc.identifier.issn0936-6768
dc.identifier.issn1439-0531
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1111/rda.13048
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/2879
dc.identifier.urihttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/rda.13048
dc.description.abstractStraws of sex‐sorted sperm are usually packaged at a low concentration (e.g., ~2.1 × 106 sperm/ml) and cost significantly more than unsorted conventional semen from the same sire. In order to maximize the efficiency of using sex‐sorted sperm under in vitro fertilization conditions, the selection of an appropriate sperm separation technique is essential. In this study, the effect of using different silane‐coated silica colloid dilutions and layering configurations during centrifugation of sex‐sorted sperm was examined over an extended period of incubation time. Sperm recovery and viability after centrifugation using the colloid separation technique were measured along with several sperm motility parameters using CASA. For this purpose, frozen and thawed sex‐sorted sperm samples were centrifuged using mini‐volume single‐layer (40%, 60% and 80%) and mini‐volume two‐layer (45%/90%, 40%/80% and 30%/60%) separation configurations using PureSperm®. A single layer of 40% PureSperm® recovered significantly more sex‐sorted sperm (78.07% ± 2.28%) followed by a single layer of 80% PureSperm® (68.43% ± 2.33%). The lowest sperm recovery was obtained using a two‐layer PureSperm® dilution of 45%/90% (47.57% ± 2.33%). Single‐layer centrifugation recovered more sorted sperm (68.67% ± 1.74%) than two layer (53.74% ± 1.74%) (p < .0001). A single layer of 80% PureSperm® exhibited the highest sorted sperm viability (72.01% ± 2.90%) after centrifugation (p < .05). The mini‐volume single layer of 80% PureSperm® was determined to be an effective alternative to a two‐layer centrifugation configuration for sex‐sorted sperm selection. In addition, single‐layer colloid dilution of 80% performed either as well as or significantly outperformed the other treatments, as well as the control, with regard to motility (MOT) for all time periods of analysis.eng
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_AR
dc.language.isoenges_AR
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relationinfo:eu-repograntAgreement/INTA/PNSA/1115053/AR. Balcarce, Buenos Aires/Biotecnologías reproductivas y desarrollo de metodologías de diagnóstico, control y prevención de las enfermedades infecciosas y parasitarias que afectan la concepción, gestación y período neonatal en especies de interés zootécnico.es_AR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesses_AR
dc.sourceReproduction in Domestic Animals 53 (1) : 26-33 (February 2018)es_AR
dc.subjectReproducciónes_AR
dc.subjectReproductioneng
dc.subjectEspermatozooes_AR
dc.subjectSpermatozoaeng
dc.subjectFecundación in Vitroes_AR
dc.subjectIn Vitro Fertilizationeng
dc.subjectCentrifugaciónes_AR
dc.subjectCentrifugingeng
dc.subjectColoideses_AR
dc.subjectColloidseng
dc.subject.otherEspermaes_AR
dc.titleEffect of different mini‐volume colloid centrifugation configurations on flow cytometrically sorted sperm recovery efficiency and quality using a computer‐assisted semen analyzeres_AR
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículoes_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_AR
dc.description.origenEEA Rafaelaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Ferre, Luis Bernardo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela; Argentina.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: Chitwood, James L. University of California Davis. Department of Animal Science; Estados Unidoses_AR
dc.description.filFil: Fresno, C. National Institute of Genomic Medicine (INMEGEN). Computational Genomics Division; Méxicoes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Ortega, Hugo Hector. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Laboratorio de Biología Celular y Molecular Aplicada; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Ciencias Veterinarias del Litoral. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Instituto de Ciencias Veterinarias del Litoral; Argentina.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: Kjelland, M.E. Conservation, Genetics and Biotech, LLCVicksburg; Estados Unidoses_AR
dc.description.filFil: Ross, Pablo J. University of California Davis. Department of Animal Science; Estados Unidoses_AR
dc.subtypecientifico


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

common

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem