Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

resumen

Resumen
Effective implementation of Sustainable Land Management (SLM) remains a major challenge worldwide because of its weak integration within the domains of science, policy, and development practice. Based on global analyses of soil erosion risk and the degree of implementation of SLM research, policies, and practices at the country level, we propose a transdisciplinary framework to address soil erosion through SLM. In the analysis, we used indices of the [ver mas...]
dc.contributor.authorHaregeweyn, Nigussie
dc.contributor.authorTsunekawa, Atsushi
dc.contributor.authorFenta, Ayele Almaw
dc.contributor.authorBorrelli, Pasquale
dc.contributor.authorPanagos, Panos
dc.contributor.authorAynekulu, Ermias
dc.contributor.authorAbe, Takeshi
dc.contributor.authorPeri, Pablo Luis
dc.contributor.authorSimon, West
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-08T10:29:20Z
dc.date.available2025-09-08T10:29:20Z
dc.date.issued2025-08
dc.identifier.citationHaregeweyn N.; Tsunekawa A.; Almaw Fenta A.; Borrelli P.; Panagos P.; Aynekulu E.; Abe T.; Peri P.L.; Simon W. (2025) A transdisciplinary framework to bridge science–policy–development gaps in global sustainable land management initiatives. Global Challenges 9(8), 2400261. https://doi.org/10.1002/gch2.202400261es_AR
dc.identifier.issn2056-6646 (online)
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1002/gch2.202400261
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/23707
dc.identifier.urihttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gch2.202400261
dc.description.abstractEffective implementation of Sustainable Land Management (SLM) remains a major challenge worldwide because of its weak integration within the domains of science, policy, and development practice. Based on global analyses of soil erosion risk and the degree of implementation of SLM research, policies, and practices at the country level, we propose a transdisciplinary framework to address soil erosion through SLM. In the analysis, we used indices of the policy–development, science–policy, and science–development interfaces to evaluate the overall science–policy–development interface (SPDI) in 236 countries. Over 190 countries (81%) were found to be currently facing moderate or high risk of increased soil erosion from two or more erosion processes, and 182 countries (77%) were found to have a SPDI level that was lower than their soil erosion risk implying the urgent need for a transdisciplinary framework that supports the implementation of future soil erosion research and development projects. Our proposed transdisciplinary framework comprises seven stages, starting from “shared research framing” and ending with “ex-post evaluation”. The framework’s practical application is discussed in the context of a recent project, emphasizing the need for country-specific studies to develop tailored frameworks.eng
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_AR
dc.language.isoenges_AR
dc.publisherWileyes_AR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_AR
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/es_AR
dc.sourceGlobal Challenges 9 (8) : 2400261 (August 2025)es_AR
dc.subjectDesertificationeng
dc.subjectDesertificaciónes_AR
dc.subjectErosioneng
dc.subjectErosiónes_AR
dc.subjectSustainable Land Managementeng
dc.subjectGestión Sostenible de la Tierraes_AR
dc.subjectRiskeng
dc.subjectRiesgoes_AR
dc.subjectMitigationeng
dc.subjectMitigaciónes_AR
dc.subject.otherScience–policy–development Interfaceeng
dc.subject.otherInterfaz Ciencia-política-desarrolloes_AR
dc.subject.otherScience–practice Interfaceeng
dc.subject.otherInterfaz Ciencia-prácticaes_AR
dc.subject.otherSoil Erosioneng
dc.subject.otherErosión del Sueloes_AR
dc.subject.otherLand Degradationeng
dc.subject.otherDegradación de la Tierraes_AR
dc.titleA Transdisciplinary Framework to Bridge Science–Policy–Development Gaps in Global Land Management Initiativeses_AR
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículoes_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_AR
dc.rights.licenseCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)es_AR
dc.description.origenEEA Santa Cruz, INTAes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Haregeweyn, Nigussie. Tottori University. International Platform for Dryland Research and Education; Japónes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Tsunekawa, Atsushi. Tottori University. International Platform for Dryland Research and Education; Japónes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Fenta, Ayele Almaw. Tottori University. International Platform for Dryland Research and Education; Japónes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Borrelli, Pasquale. University of Basel. Environmental Geosciences. Department of Environmental Sciences; Suizaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Panagos, Panos. Joint Research Centre Ispra. European Commission; Italiaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Aynekulu, Ermias. World Agroforestry (ICRAF); Kenia.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: Abe, Takeshi. Tottori University. International Platform for Dryland Research and Education; Japónes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santa Cruz; Argentina.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral; Argentina.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: Simon, West. The Australian National University. Crawford School of Public Policy; Australia.es_AR
dc.description.filFil: Simon, West. Stockholm University. Stockholm Resilience Centre; Sueciaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Simon, West. Charles Darwin University. Northern Institute; Australia.es_AR
dc.subtypecientifico


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

common

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess