Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Instagram
    • español
    • English
  • Contacto
  • English 
    • español
    • English
  • Login
AboutAuthorsTitlesSubjectsCollectionsCommunities☰
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
View Item 
    xmlui.general.dspace_homeCentros Regionales y EEAsCentro Regional Patagonia SurEEA Santa CruzArtículos científicosxmlui.ArtifactBrowser.ItemViewer.trail
  • DSpace Home
  • Centros Regionales y EEAs
  • Centro Regional Patagonia Sur
  • EEA Santa Cruz
  • Artículos científicos
  • View Item

Litterfall and nutrients return in Nothofagus antarctica forests growing in a site quality gradient with different management uses in Southern Patagonia

Abstract
We evaluated the annual litterfall and nutrients return in primary forests of Nothofagus antarctica growing at three different site classes (SC) (III, IV and V) and compared two of these forests with adjacent stands under silvopastoral use (thinned 40 years ago), in Patagonia, Argentina. Traps were installed in each stand and sampled monthly during the litterfall over 10 years. Sample from the five stands was ground for further analyses of nutrients (N, [ver mas...]
We evaluated the annual litterfall and nutrients return in primary forests of Nothofagus antarctica growing at three different site classes (SC) (III, IV and V) and compared two of these forests with adjacent stands under silvopastoral use (thinned 40 years ago), in Patagonia, Argentina. Traps were installed in each stand and sampled monthly during the litterfall over 10 years. Sample from the five stands was ground for further analyses of nutrients (N, P, K, Ca, Mg and S). The litterfall varied significantly between SC, but not between years, from 1,306 to 1,972 kg ha−1 in the best site. The nutrients return from litterfall did not change neither between site classes and years in most nutrients. Comparing primary forests with silvopastoral stands, in SCIV, significant differences among uses occurred for litterfall production and nutrients return, being higher in primary forest. While, in SCV, the litterfall and nutrients return practically did not change among uses. The results showed the incidence of site quality and forest use on the litterfall and nutrients return in N. antarctica forests. [Cerrar]
Thumbnail
Author
Bahamonde, Héctor Alejandro;   Peri, Pablo Luis;   Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José;   Monelos, Lucas H.;  
Fuente
European journal of forest research 134 (1) : 113–124. (January 2015)
Date
2015-01
ISSN
1612-4669
1612-4677
URI
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10342-014-0837-z
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/2355
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-014-0837-z
Formato
pdf
Tipo de documento
artículo
Palabras Claves
Nothofagus; Bosques; Forests; Hojarasca; Plant Litter; Nutrientes; Nutrients; Sistemas Silvopascícolas; Silvopastoral Systems; Características del Sitio; Site Factors; Nothofagus antarctica; Región Patagónica; Sistemas Silvopastoriles; Ñire;
Derechos de acceso
Restringido
Descargar
Compartir
  • Compartir
    Facebook Email Twitter Mendeley
Excepto donde se diga explicitamente, este item se publica bajo la siguiente descripción: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Unported (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5)
Metadata
Show full item record