Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

resumen

Resumen
Nothofagus antarctica, is the most important species of the silvopastoral systems of southern Patagonia. However, there is limited information on the ecophysiological response mechanisms of seedlings for survival under different resource availability regimes, and whether such processes may differ between provenances. In this study, we evaluated the functional response to water shortage of seedlings of four N. antarctica provenances grown under controlled [ver mas...]
dc.contributor.authorBahamonde, Héctor Alejandro
dc.contributor.authorSánchez-Gómez, David
dc.contributor.authorGyenge, Javier Enrique
dc.contributor.authorPeri, Pablo Luis
dc.contributor.authorCellini, Juan Manuel
dc.contributor.authorAranda, Ismael
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-07T17:30:42Z
dc.date.available2018-05-07T17:30:42Z
dc.date.issued2017-12
dc.identifier.issn0167-4366
dc.identifier.issn1572-9680
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-017-0167-5
dc.identifier.urihttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10457-017-0167-5
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/2343
dc.description.abstractNothofagus antarctica, is the most important species of the silvopastoral systems of southern Patagonia. However, there is limited information on the ecophysiological response mechanisms of seedlings for survival under different resource availability regimes, and whether such processes may differ between provenances. In this study, we evaluated the functional response to water shortage of seedlings of four N. antarctica provenances grown under controlled conditions. After an initial full irrigation period, seedlings were subjected to a water shortage cycle. Measurements of the diameter at the base of the stem, net photosynthesis (An), stomatal conductance to water vapour (gs), predawn water potential (Ψpd), osmotic potential at maximum and zero turgor (Π100; Π0), relative water content at zero turgor (RWC0) and maximum modulus of elasticity (Emax) were carried out during the experimental period. Differences between provenances concerning An and gs rates were recorded under full irrigation conditions, but were not detected in association with drought stress. All provenances had similar osmotic potential values (Π100 and Π0) at full irrigation, but water shortage led to significant osmotic potential differences between provenances. During the whole experimental period, no significant differences on RWC0 and Emax values were recorded among provenances. Under full irrigation conditions, all N. antarctica provenances had a similar physiological performance which suggests that environmental conditions may be the main driver for phenotypic differences in this species. From the osmotic adjustment results gathered, it is derived that a major osmoregulation capacity in response to water shortage is a common feature of all the N. antarctica provenances evaluated.eng
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_AR
dc.language.isoenges_AR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesses_AR
dc.sourceAgroforestry Systems 93 (2) : 689–701 (April 2019)es_AR
dc.subjectNothofaguses_AR
dc.subjectSistemas Silvopascícolases_AR
dc.subjectSilvopastoral Systemseng
dc.subjectSostenibilidades_AR
dc.subjectSustainabilityeng
dc.subjectPlántulases_AR
dc.subjectSeedlingseng
dc.subjectAgotamiento del Aguaes_AR
dc.subjectWater Depletioneng
dc.subjectDéficites_AR
dc.subjectShortageseng
dc.subject.otherNothofagus antarcticaes_AR
dc.subject.otherSistemas Silvopastorileses_AR
dc.titleThinking in the sustainability of Nothofagus antarctica silvopastoral systems, how differ the responses of seedlings from different provenances to water shortage?es_AR
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículoes_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_AR
dc.description.origenEEA Santa Cruzes_AR
dc.description.origenEEA Balcarce
dc.description.filFil: Bahamonde, Héctor Alejandro. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santa Cruz; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Sánchez-Gómez, David. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Agrarias y Tecnologías Agroalimentarias (INIA). Centro de Investigación Forestal. Department of Forest Ecology and Genetics; España. Instituto Regional de Investigación y Desarrollo Agroalimentario y Forestal de Castilla La Mancha (IRIAF). Centro de Investigación Agroforestal de Albaladejito (CIAF); Españaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Gyenge, Javier Enrique. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce. Agencia de Extensión Rural Tandil; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santa Cruz; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Cellini, Juan Manuel. Universidad Nacional de la Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo. Laboratorio de Investigacion en Sistemas Ecologicos y Ambientales; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Aranda, Ismael. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Agrarias y Tecnologías Agroalimentarias (INIA). Centro de Investigación Forestal. Department of Forest Ecology and Genetics; Españaes_AR
dc.subtypecientifico


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

common

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem