Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

resumen

Resumen
People’s perceptions of wildlife are influenced by various factors. Studying these factors is a valuable tool to help conserve agro-biodiversity. The objective of this study was to analyze farmers’ perception of birds and mammals in a highly modified area of the Pampas region in Argentina, and to understand the factors that influence their decisions to apply methods that promote or control wildlife. An online survey was conducted to examine farmers’ [ver mas...]
dc.contributor.authorGorosabel, Antonella
dc.contributor.authorvon Below, Jonathan
dc.contributor.authorBernad, Lucía
dc.contributor.authorPedrana, Julieta
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-24T11:31:36Z
dc.date.available2024-09-24T11:31:36Z
dc.date.issued2024-09
dc.identifier.issn1618-1093 (Online)
dc.identifier.issn1617-1381 (Print)
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2024.126722
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/19513
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1617138124001717
dc.description.abstractPeople’s perceptions of wildlife are influenced by various factors. Studying these factors is a valuable tool to help conserve agro-biodiversity. The objective of this study was to analyze farmers’ perception of birds and mammals in a highly modified area of the Pampas region in Argentina, and to understand the factors that influence their decisions to apply methods that promote or control wildlife. An online survey was conducted to examine farmers’ perception of different animal groups, considering their economic activities and the factors influencing their decision to favor or control certain species. We received 65 responses, which revealed a negative perception toward two groups of birds and five groups of mammals, a neutral perception for one group of birds and four groups of mammals, and a positive for five groups of birds. Preserving natural vegetation along roadsides and field margins was the primary method to promote birds while reducing agrochemical use to promote mammals. Shooting was the main method employed to control all animals. The farmers’ positive perception, their main economic activity, and whether they resided on the farm significantly influenced their decisions to implement methods to promote species. The farmers’ negative perception, their main economic activity, their residence on the rural property, and their age affected their decisions to implement methods for controlling species. Understanding farmers’ perceptions and the drivers behind their decisions to promote or control species represent the initial step toward achieving sustainable management of agroecosystems.eng
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_AR
dc.language.isoenges_AR
dc.publisherElsevieres_AR
dc.relationinfo:eu-repograntAgreement/INTA/2019-PD-E2-I038-002, Evaluación, monitoreo y manejo de la biodiversidad en sistemas agropecuarios y forestaleses_AR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesses_AR
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/es_AR
dc.sourceJournal for Nature Conservation 82 : 126722 (December 2024)es_AR
dc.subjectServicios de los Ecosistemases_AR
dc.subjectEcosystem Serviceseng
dc.subjectRelación Hombre- Naturalezaes_AR
dc.subjectHumam- Wildlife Relationseng
dc.subjectActitud del Agricultores_AR
dc.subjectFarmers' Attitudeseng
dc.subjectOrdenación de la Vida Silvestrees_AR
dc.subjectWildlife Managementeng
dc.subjectComportamiento Humanoes_AR
dc.subjectHuman Behavioureng
dc.subjectArgentinaes_AR
dc.subjectAgroecosistemas
dc.subjectAgroecosystemseng
dc.subject.otherRegión Pampeana
dc.titleFarmers’ perceptions of wildlife in agroecosystems: Insights from a highly modified area of the Pampas region, Argentinaes_AR
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículoes_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_AR
dc.rights.licenseCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)es_AR
dc.description.origenEEA Balcarcees_AR
dc.description.filFil: Gorosábel, Antonella. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Innovación para la Producción Agropecuaria y el Desarrollo Sostenible; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: von Below, Jonathan. Universidad Nacional de Misiones. Facultad de Ciencias Forestales; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: von Below, Jonathan. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Fundación Bariloche; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Bernad, Lucía. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Innovación para la Producción Agropecuaria y el Desarrollo Sostenible; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Pedrana, Julieta. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Pedrana, Julieta. Universidad Tecnológica Nacional. Facultad Regional Mar del Plata. Departamento de Medio Ambiente; Argentinaes_AR
dc.subtypecientifico


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

common

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess