Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

resumen

Resumen
The aim of this work was to analyze the R. microplus (Canestrini, 1888) infestation in two bovine herds with different degrees of natural resistance (i.e., Hereford and Braford) to ticks subjected to an identical chemical treatment scheme to ticks at the same farm, to demonstrate the impact on tick control of the incorporation of a more resistant bovine breed. Two groups of ten Hereford and Braford cows each were subjected to eleven chemical treatments [ver mas...]
dc.contributor.authorMorel, Nicolas
dc.contributor.authorTorrents, Jorgelina
dc.contributor.authorNava, Santiago
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-17T10:23:59Z
dc.date.available2024-07-17T10:23:59Z
dc.date.issued2024-05
dc.identifier.issn1572-9702 (electronic)
dc.identifier.issn0168-8162
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-024-00922-7
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/18529
dc.identifier.urihttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10493-024-00922-7
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this work was to analyze the R. microplus (Canestrini, 1888) infestation in two bovine herds with different degrees of natural resistance (i.e., Hereford and Braford) to ticks subjected to an identical chemical treatment scheme to ticks at the same farm, to demonstrate the impact on tick control of the incorporation of a more resistant bovine breed. Two groups of ten Hereford and Braford cows each were subjected to eleven chemical treatments between August 2022 and October 2023 (four fluazuron, two fipronil 1%, one ivermectin 3.15% and four immersion in a dipping vat with a combination of cypermethrin 10% and ethion 40%). Tick population was shown to be susceptible to ivermectin, fluazuron and the mix cypermethrin 10%-ethion 40% and resistant to fipronil according to in vitro tests. Tick infestation was significantly greater in the Hereford cows than in the Braford cows. Tick infestation in both Hereford and Braford breeds was similar when treatment with functional drugs was applied, but when a block of the treatments was done with drugs with decreased functionality due to resistance (i.e. fipronil), treatment failure was manifested more strongly in the most susceptible breed. The incorporation of cattle breeds with moderate or high resistance to R. microplus is instrumental to optimize the efficacy and sustainability of chemical control of ticks in a scenario where resistance to one or more chemical groups is almost ubiquitous, because it favors the biological control of this parasite.eng
dc.description.sponsorshipAsociación Cooperadora INTA Rafaela. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (PIP 1799). Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Productiva de la Provincia de Santa Fe (PIO140).es_AR
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_AR
dc.language.isoenges_AR
dc.publisherSpringer Naturees_AR
dc.relationinfo:eu-repograntAgreement/INTA/2019-PE-E5-I109-001, Convocatoria: Estudios para el control de enfermedades subtropicales y/o transmitidas por vectores (Tristeza Bovina, Garrapatas, Miasis, Tripanosomiasis, Lengua Azul y laes_AR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesses_AR
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/es_AR
dc.sourceExperimental and Applied Acarology 93 : 71-79 (May 2024)es_AR
dc.subjectCattleeng
dc.subjectGanado Bovinoes_AR
dc.subjectControl Methodseng
dc.subjectMétodos de Controles_AR
dc.subjectCattle Breedseng
dc.subjectRaza Bovinaes_AR
dc.subjectParasite Resistanceeng
dc.subjectResistencia de los Parásitoses_AR
dc.subjectRhipicephalus
dc.subject.otherTickseng
dc.subject.otherGarrapatases_AR
dc.subject.otherRhipicephalus microplus
dc.titleComparative analysis of Rhipicephalus microplus (Canestrini, 1888) infestation in pure breed (Hereford) and cross breed (Braford) cattle herds subjected to the same chemical treatmentses_AR
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículoes_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_AR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_AR
dc.rights.licenseCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)es_AR
dc.description.origenEEA Rafaelaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Morel, Nicolas. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela. Instituto de Investigación de la Cadena Láctea (IdICaL); Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Morel, Nicolas. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Investigación de la Cadena Láctea (IdICaL); Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Torrents, Jorgelina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela. Instituto de Investigación de la Cadena Láctea (IdICaL); Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Torrents, Jorgelina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Investigación de la Cadena Láctea (IdICaL); Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Torrents, Jorgelina. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Esperanza, Santa Fe; Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Nava, Santiago. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela. Instituto de Investigación de la Cadena Láctea (IdICaL); Argentinaes_AR
dc.description.filFil: Nava, Santiago. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Investigación de la Cadena Láctea (IdICaL); Argentinaes_AR
dc.subtypecientifico


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

common

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess