Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
resumen
Resumen
The aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to identify the main infectious agents related to bovine abortion worldwide in the period between 2000 and 2022. First, we investigated the global prevalence of infectious agents related to bovine abortion. For this analysis, only 27 articles detected of a wide panel of agents were included. The random effects model revealed that the estimated prevalence of the abortifacient agents in bovine
[ver mas...]
dc.contributor.author | Hecker, Yanina | |
dc.contributor.author | González Ortega, Sara | |
dc.contributor.author | Cano, Santiago | |
dc.contributor.author | Ortega Mora, Luis Miguel | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-05-24T12:27:46Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-05-24T12:27:46Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023-09 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2297-1769 | |
dc.identifier.other | https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1249410 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/17880 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2023.1249410/full | |
dc.description.abstract | The aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to identify the main infectious agents related to bovine abortion worldwide in the period between 2000 and 2022. First, we investigated the global prevalence of infectious agents related to bovine abortion. For this analysis, only 27 articles detected of a wide panel of agents were included. The random effects model revealed that the estimated prevalence of the abortifacient agents in bovine abortion was 45.7%. The heterogeneity among studies was high, but Egger’s test showed that there was no publication bias, even though the total number of samples analyzed in these articles was variable. There was no significant effect of the year of the study publication on the estimated prevalence, although an increasing trend was observed over time, possibly due to the implementation of new diagnostic techniques. Then, we analyzed the prevalence of the main transmissible agents in bovine abortion. For this analysis, 76 studies that analyzed 19,070 cases were included. Some infectious agent was detected in 7,319 specimens, and a final diagnosis was reached in 3,977 of these, when both the infectious agent and compatible histopathological changes were detected. We found that Neospora caninum was the most detected agent (22.2%), followed by opportunistic bacteria (21.4%), Chlamydiaceae family (10.9%) and Coxiella burnetii (9.5%). Regarding viral agents, bovine herpes virus type 1 and bovine viral diarrhea displayed similar prevalence rates (approximately 5%). After considering the description of specific histopathological changes, our analyzes showed that N. caninum was a confirmed cause of abortion in 16.7% of the analyzed cases, followed by opportunistic bacteria (12.6%) and Chlamydia spp. (6.8%); however, C. burnetii was only confirmed as a cause of abortion in 1.1% of the cases. For all agents, the heterogeneity among studies was high, and the subgroup analyzes discarded the diagnostic method as the cause of such heterogeneity. This study provides knowledge about the global prevalence of the different infectious agents related to bovine abortion, the most coming of which is N. caninum. In addition, this review reveals the existing deficiencies in the diagnosis of bovine abortion that must be addressed in the future. | eng |
dc.format | application/pdf | es_AR |
dc.language.iso | eng | es_AR |
dc.publisher | Frontiers Media | es_AR |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es_AR |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ | es_AR |
dc.source | Frontiers in Veterinary Science 10 : 1-17 (29 September 2023) | es_AR |
dc.subject | Bovinae | es_AR |
dc.subject | Aborto | es_AR |
dc.subject | Abortion | eng |
dc.subject | Agentes Infecciosos | es_AR |
dc.subject | Infective Agents | eng |
dc.subject | Diagnóstico | es_AR |
dc.subject | Diagnosis | eng |
dc.subject | Ganado Bovino | |
dc.subject | Cattle | eng |
dc.title | Bovine infectious abortion: a systematic review and meta-analysis | es_AR |
dc.type | info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo | es_AR |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_AR |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | es_AR |
dc.rights.license | Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) | es_AR |
dc.description.origen | EEA Balcarce | es_AR |
dc.description.fil | Fil: Hecker, Yanina Paola. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce. Instituto de Innovación para la Producción Agropecuaria y el Desarrollo Sostenible; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Innovación para la Producción Agropecuaria y el Desarrollo Sostenible; Argentina | es_AR |
dc.description.fil | Fil: Hecker, Yanina Paola. Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Facultad de Veterinaria; España | es_AR |
dc.description.fil | Fil: González Ortega, Sara. Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Facultad de Veterinaria; España | es_AR |
dc.description.fil | Fil: Cano, Santiago. Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Centro de Apoyo a la Investigación; España | es_AR |
dc.description.fil | Fil: Ortega Mora, Luis Miguel. Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Facultad de Veterinaria; España | es_AR |
dc.subtype | cientifico |
Ficheros en el ítem
Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)
common
-
Artículos científicos [688]