Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

resumen

Resumen
Afforestation has been proposed as an effective tool for protecting primary and/or secondary forests and for mitigating atmospheric CO2. However, the dynamics of primary productivity differs between plantations and natural forests. The objective of this work was to evaluate the potential for carbon storage of a commercial pine plantation by determining its carbon balance. Measurements started when trees were aged 6 and ended when they were older than 8 [ver mas...]
dc.contributor.authorPosse Beaulieu, Gabriela
dc.contributor.authorLewczuk, Nuria
dc.contributor.authorRichter, Klaus
dc.contributor.authorCristiano, Piedad María
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-20T13:02:34Z
dc.date.available2017-10-20T13:02:34Z
dc.date.issued2016-10
dc.identifier.issn1971-7458
dc.identifier.otherdoi: 10.3832/ifor 1815-009
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/1546
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sisef.it/iforest/pdf/?id=ifor1815-009
dc.description.abstractAfforestation has been proposed as an effective tool for protecting primary and/or secondary forests and for mitigating atmospheric CO2. However, the dynamics of primary productivity differs between plantations and natural forests. The objective of this work was to evaluate the potential for carbon storage of a commercial pine plantation by determining its carbon balance. Measurements started when trees were aged 6 and ended when they were older than 8 years. We measured CO2 and water vapor concentrations using the Eddy covariance method. Gross primary productivity in 2010 and 2011 was 4290 ± 473 g C m-2 and 4015 ± 485 g C m-2, respectively. Ecosystem respiration ranged between 7 and 20 g C m-2 d-1, reaching peaks in all Februaries. Of the 30 months monitored, the plantation acted as carbon source for 21 months and as carbon sink for 6 months, while values close to neutrality were obtained during 3 months. The positive balance representing CO2 loss by the system was most likely due to the cut branches left on the ground following pruning activities. The plantation was subjected to pruning in January and September 2008 and to sanitary pruning in October 2010. In all cases, cut branches were not removed but remained on the ground. Residue management seems to have a very important impact on carbon balance.eng
dc.formatapplication/pdfeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesseng
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.sourceiForest 9 : 736-742. (October 2016)
dc.subjectAforestación
dc.subjectAfforestationeng
dc.subjectCarbono
dc.subjectCarboneng
dc.subjectPoda
dc.subjectPinus
dc.titleCarbon and water vapor balance in a subtropical pine plantationeng
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleeng
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioneng
dc.rights.licenseCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
dc.description.origenInst. de Clima y Agua
dc.gic1152
dc.description.filFil: Posse Beaulieu, Gabriela. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Clima y Agua; Argentina
dc.description.filFil: Lewczuk, Nuria. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Clima y Agua; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
dc.description.filFil: Richter, Klaus. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Clima y Agua; Argentina
dc.description.filFil: Cristiano, Piedad María. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de Ecología, Genética y Evolución. Laboratorio de Ecología Funcional; Argentina
dc.subtypecientifico


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

common

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess